Originally Posted by major liability

This will have positively no effect on their society unless they ban the human sex drive as well.

You'd think they'd want more such publications about, if they're trying to control their birth rate.

isn't there a US state where it's illegal to own sex toys?

If there is, I feel sorry for its residents and their lack of freedom.

Originally Posted by Infern0

isn't there a US state where it's illegal to own sex toys?

As recently as 1990, these states had laws against the use of [sex toys]: Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Washington D.C.

http://www.dribbleglass.com/subpages...ge/sexlaws.htm

Originally Posted by phoenix80

following Taliban? It's weird......

Or that of John Ashcroft.

I'd like to see them enforce that. The only situation I can think of where they'd be able to is if you are already commiting a crime by getting it on in a public space.

I wonder what exactly the Chinese are trying to achieve with this legislation. What will it prevent? What will it contribute? Are they just insane?

As recently as 1990, these states had laws against the use of [sex toys]: Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Washington D.C.

You got to be kidding, wow what boring places to be.

Originally Posted by Kiwi

You got to be kidding, wow what boring places to be.

Well, seeing how most of those States are in the Bible Belt I'd say the Elected Officials wanted the people living there to spend more time reading the Bible and less time reading the intended use of and safe operating instructions for the toys in question.

Bible Belt states? You're kidding right? The Bible Belt is commonly defined as those Southern states dominated by the Southern Baptist Convention and a few other protestant denominations. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, DC, Idaho, Arizona, Virginia, and even Maryland would not be considered Bible Belt States. In fact most of those states are not even Southern. Ok so maybe I'll concede VA but...

Originally Posted by DTop

Bible Belt states? You're kidding right? The Bible Belt is commonly defined as those Southern states dominated by the Southern Baptist Convention and a few other protestant denominations. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, DC, Idaho, Arizona, Virginia, and even Maryland would not be considered Bible Belt States. In fact most of those states are not even Southern.

I counted Virginia, not the Buckle of the Belt, and not in NOVA, but I've been around Virginia, south and west of NOVA, and it's pretty much like the Carolina's religiously. I didn't count DC either way, seeing how it is a Federal District.

I conceded VA but those other states are hardly Bible Belters. Liberal? Some but Bilbe Belt, hardly.

Honestly though, how're they going to enforce that? The sex toys thing, I mean.