YO Phoenix!... Regime Change in IRAN




 
--
YO Phoenix!... Regime Change in IRAN
 
May 26th, 2007  
bulldogg
 
 

Topic: YO Phoenix!... Regime Change in IRAN


YO Phoenix!... Regime Change in IRAN
Quote:
Regime Change in Iran? UPDATED

The Blotter reported this week that President Bush has (finally) tasked the CIA with regime change in Iran. Not surprising, really, especially given the additional support Iran has given to terrorists in both Iraq and Lebanon recently.
I was all prepared to unload on ABC News for releasing yet another CIA "secret", but it seems that the White House has been remarkably quiet about the "leak".
Which leads me to believe that the "leak" was actually by design. How's that for a hint, Iran?
Of course, this "leak" probably indicates that military action against Iran isn't in the offing anytime soon.
***UPDATED***: CBS News reports that industrial sabotage is the way to go... for now.
Quote:
Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran

May 22, 2007 6:29 PM
Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report:
The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.
The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject, say President Bush has signed a "nonlethal presidential finding" that puts into motion a CIA plan that reportedly includes a coordinated campaign of propaganda, disinformation and manipulation of Iran's currency and international financial transactions.
"I can't confirm or deny whether such a program exists or whether the president signed it, but it would be consistent with an overall American approach trying to find ways to put pressure on the regime," said Bruce Riedel, a recently retired CIA senior official who dealt with Iran and other countries in the region.

A National Security Council spokesperson, Gordon Johndroe, said, "The White House does not comment on intelligence matters." A CIA spokesperson said, "As a matter of course, we do not comment on allegations of covert activity."
The sources say the CIA developed the covert plan over the last year and received approval from White House officials and other officials in the intelligence community.
Officials say the covert plan is designed to pressure Iran to stop its nuclear enrichment program and end aid to insurgents in Iraq.
"There are some channels where the United States government may want to do things without its hand showing, and legally, therefore, the administration would, if it's doing that, need an intelligence finding and would need to tell the Congress," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, a former White House counterterrorism official.
Current and former intelligence officials say the approval of the covert action means the Bush administration, for the time being, has decided not to pursue a military option against Iran.


"Vice President Cheney helped to lead the side favoring a military strike," said former CIA official Riedel, "but I think they have come to the conclusion that a military strike has more downsides than upsides."
The covert action plan comes as U.S. officials have confirmed Iran had dramatically increased its ability to produce nuclear weapons material, at a pace that experts said would give them the ability to build a nuclear bomb in two years.
Riedel says economic pressure on Iran may be the most effective tool available to the CIA, particularly in going after secret accounts used to fund the nuclear program.
"The kind of dealings that the Iranian Revolution Guards are going to do, in terms of purchasing nuclear and missile components, are likely to be extremely secret, and you're going to have to work very, very hard to find them, and that's exactly the kind of thing the CIA's nonproliferation center and others would be expert at trying to look into," Riedel said.
Under the law, the CIA needs an official presidential finding to carry out such covert actions. The CIA is permitted to mount covert "collection" operations without a presidential finding.

"Presidential findings" are kept secret but reported to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and other key congressional leaders.
Check out the Brian Ross Webcast: More on CIA's 'Black' Operation in Iran
The "nonlethal" aspect of the presidential finding means CIA officers may not use deadly force in carrying out the secret operations against Iran.
Still, some fear that even a nonlethal covert CIA program carries great risks.
"I think everybody in the region knows that there is a proxy war already afoot with the United States supporting anti-Iranian elements in the region as well as opposition groups within Iran," said Vali Nasr, adjunct senior fellow for Mideast studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
"And this covert action is now being escalated by the new U.S. directive, and that can very quickly lead to Iranian retaliation and a cycle of escalation can follow," Nasr said.
Other "lethal" findings have authorized CIA covert actions against al Qaeda, terrorism and nuclear proliferation.
Also briefed on the CIA proposal, according to intelligence sources, were National Security Advisor Steve Hadley and Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott Abrams.
"The entire plan has been blessed by Abrams, in particular," said one intelligence source familiar with the plan. "And Hadley had to put his chop on it."
Abrams' last involvement with attempting to destabilize a foreign government led to criminal charges.

He pleaded guilty in October 1991 to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress about the Reagan administration's ill-fated efforts to destabilize the Nicaraguan Sandinista government in Central America, known as the Iran-Contra affair. Abrams was later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush in December 1992.

In June 2001, Abrams was named by then National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to head the National Security Council's office for democracy, human rights and international operations. On Feb. 2, 2005, National Security Advisor Hadley appointed Abrams deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for global democracy strategy, one of the nation's most senior national security positions.

As earlier reported on the Blotter on ABCNews.com, the United States has supported and encouraged an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, that has conducted deadly raids inside Iran from bases on the rugged Iran-Pakistan-Afghanistan "tri-border region."

U.S. officials deny any "direct funding" of Jundullah groups but say the leader of Jundullah was in regular contact with U.S. officials.

American intelligence sources say Jundullah has received money and weapons through the Afghanistan and Pakistan military and Pakistan's intelligence service. Pakistan has officially denied any connection.

A report broadcast on Iranian TV last Sunday said Iranian authorities had captured 10 men crossing the border with $500,000 in cash along with "maps of sensitive areas" and "modern spy equipment."

A senior Pakistani official told ABCNews.com the 10 men were members of Jundullah.
The leader of the Jundullah group, according to the Pakistani official, has been recruiting and training "hundreds of men" for "unspecified missions" across the border in Iran.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/...uthorizes.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2843582.shtml

Its about damn time... whadaya say there Phoenix?
May 26th, 2007  
phoenix80
 
 
I read that yesterday on ABC Blog. Thanks dude, but I wish I could trust ABC and other MSM outlets
May 26th, 2007  
phoenix80
 
 
Btw, you can also read this one

http://pajamasmedia.com/xpress/micha...3/the_plot.php
--
YO Phoenix!... Regime Change in IRAN
May 28th, 2007  
Big_Z
 
 
Iran has been making the lives of US troops in Iraq uncomfortable so its only fair we return the favor.
May 28th, 2007  
phoenix80
 
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Z
Iran has been making the lives of US troops in Iraq uncomfortable so its only fair we return the favor.
True!
May 28th, 2007  
Damien435
 
 
Why wasn't the CIA working on this 27 years ago? Why is it that only in the year 2007 does the CIA receive permission to start tampering with a government that has been openly hostile towards the United States for the last three decades? Why is it that it takes four years of violence in Iraq, being funded by Iran, to get the CIA involved? I am glad it is happening now, but I'd be even happier if it happened years ago.
May 28th, 2007  
Big_Z
 
 
The CIA is and always has been in everybody's business. They are now stepping up their game and putting serious resources into Iran. Thats my take on it anyways. This is probably their declaration of war you could say.
May 28th, 2007  
Marinerhodes
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien435
Why wasn't the CIA working on this 27 years ago? Why is it that only in the year 2007 does the CIA receive permission to start tampering with a government that has been openly hostile towards the United States for the last three decades? Why is it that it takes four years of violence in Iraq, being funded by Iran, to get the CIA involved? I am glad it is happening now, but I'd be even happier if it happened years ago.
We finally have a President that has balls and can make his own decisions.
May 28th, 2007  
major liability
 
 
What the hell? Are you really supposed to be able to read about "black" operations in the paper?
May 28th, 2007  
DefiantCdr
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
What the hell? Are you really supposed to be able to read about "black" operations in the paper?

Shouldnt the US have some sort of National Secrets Act to prevent that?
 


Similar Topics
As U.S. Puts Pressure On Iran, Gulf's Religious Rift Spreads
U.S. Bid To Limit Iran Gets Wary Response
De-Arabization of Iran
What If Iran Gets the Bomb? Good Analysis
Rice warns Iran of UN sanctions