WWII Quiz
perseus
Active member
My apologies Reiben (and other repliers for your efforts)
I saw your seperate answer 'Hitler' on the top of the page and didn't see the word Rommel pasted seperately on the previous post. My reply 'No' refered to the only message I could see on that page 'Hitler'.
Rommel is the correct answer of course since he led the 7th Panzer division at Arras. He must have been kicking himself for saying this!
Your turn Reiben
I saw your seperate answer 'Hitler' on the top of the page and didn't see the word Rommel pasted seperately on the previous post. My reply 'No' refered to the only message I could see on that page 'Hitler'.
Rommel is the correct answer of course since he led the 7th Panzer division at Arras. He must have been kicking himself for saying this!
Your turn Reiben
Last edited:
perseus
Active member
I suspect you are thinking of the method of refelling. The French used special tankers which could only fill the tanks one at a time, whereas the Germans used 'Jerrycans' which could fill the tanks simultaneously.
If this the correct answer, I am away until Monday so please carry on without me.
If this the correct answer, I am away until Monday so please carry on without me.
perseus
Active member
Breuneau lost contact with the petrol tankers.
Other reasons for the delay included, refugees on the roads which also prevented rapid deployment of the tanks. There were also communication problems due to the complex command structure which prevented a rapid response. Georges had to go through another subordinate commander Blanchard in charge of the 1st army who then relayed the message to Bruneau. There also seems to be a command to cancel the counter attack to bolster up another division.
Last edited:
perseus said:
You correctly stated that Germans used Jerry cans, whilst the French used tankers, which slowed the rate of refuelling.
The tankers lost contact with the tanks. The tanks were short of fuel and the petrol in the tankers was required for the attack. The counter attack near Dinant was abandoned. The tanks remained in and around Flavion until the tankers arrived. The tankers were found at Oret 5 miles from Flavion, but due to the number of tanks it was too late to fill them with petrol.
Perseus was closest, over to you.
perseus said:
HMT Lancastria sunk on 17 June 1940 carrying over 6,000 people evacuated from France. The port was St Nazaire. The ship was sunk from bombs from Dornier DO17s. or Junkers 88s, seem to be conflicting reports on that The germans straffed those in the water. The ship was dangerous overloaded and seems that MoD ignored the ships captain about the maximum load restriction.
perseus
Active member
Reiben
I think this is near enough. What I was looking for was that the Lancastria was anchored, waiting of a destroyer escort rather than circling near the harbour, despite being in an air raid a few hours earlier. It is estimated that 3500 people may have died in this incident.
The Floristan in contrast was on its way home and managed to swerve the bombs, the attacking aircraft being brought down by Bren gun fire.
It is interesting that as many as 144 000 British servicemen and 47 000 allied soldiers were evacuated from south of the Somme during that period.
The Floristan in contrast was on its way home and managed to swerve the bombs, the attacking aircraft being brought down by Bren gun fire.
It is interesting that as many as 144 000 British servicemen and 47 000 allied soldiers were evacuated from south of the Somme during that period.