WW2 if the USA hadn't entered the war - Page 3




View Poll Results :What would have happened if the USA had not entered the war in 1941
Germany would have beaten the USSR and then Britain 10 38.46%
USSR would have won 4 15.38%
Britain would have won 0 0%
Stalemate - still at war by 1955 5 19.23%
German resources = victory by 1965 2 7.69%
Japan takes control of the East 0 0%
USSR beats Germany - war against GB and Japan 4 15.38%
Germany beats GB then attacks USSR 1 3.85%
War still going on 2004 0 0%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

 
--
 
October 4th, 2005  
Peterminator
 
Guten tag
Sprechen sie duchen




I hope I made myself clear
October 4th, 2005  
Rabs
 
 
They needed there resources elsewere because they were fighting the US.
October 4th, 2005  
Springfield
 
 
If the USA wouldn't have entered World War 2, I think Germany would have beaten USSR and Great Britain. The USA, USSR, and Great Britain, together were very powerful, but without the USA, I don't think it would be been possible to beat Axis Powers.
--
October 5th, 2005  
Armyjaeger
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaZoOkAzNgReNaDeZ
If the USA wouldn't have entered World War 2, I think Germany would have beaten USSR and Great Britain. The USA, USSR, and Great Britain, together were very powerful, but without the USA, I don't think it would be been possible to beat Axis Powers.
I agree, with no major western front to fight in germany could have concenstrated its recourses mainly to the east, those recourses that would have otherwise been needed in the war against U.S
One other thing too, with no U.S support I don't think the allies could have ever gained total air supremacy which was also a critical factor of defeating germany.
October 5th, 2005  
mmarsh
 
 
Im not going to vote because It all hinges on whether Lend-Lease was going on.

If Lend lease was not extended to the USSR Germany would have won as the Russians would have not been able to buy enough time to move their heavy industry to the Urals and restart their military production. Secondly the loss of the Causauses and the Ukraine meant that the USSR would neither have food or fuel (in history the US supplied both) to keep their army moving.

OR...

If Lend Lease was extended the Russians would have won in pretty much the same fashion as history happened. Germany would have made tremendous advances inside the USSR but the lend-lease equipment and the soviet winter would have bought enough time to rebuild the USSR's lost infrastructure.

Then the sheer numbers of the modern equipped Red Army would have pushed the Germans back.
October 24th, 2005  
LeEnfield
 
 
It should be remembered that India, was fighting hard on Britain's side and 8 million Indians had already volunteered to fight for Britain, the largest volunteer Army in the World
October 25th, 2005  
Zucchini
 
If Moscow had fallen in in 1941, then there would have been a very good chance lend lease to Russia would have been killed off before it got off the ground - which it hadn't really done at that point in time.

It's very possible the United States would have entered into an agreement with Hitler to avoid involvement in the war.
October 25th, 2005  
sandy
 
I think
US>controrled war to sell Resource to german and USSR.
USSR>not win,but not lose.kept their territory and collapsed economy.
Germany>concured EUROPE without Britain and collapsed economy.
China>now under cold civil war between communist and nationalist.
Manchuria empire>survived.
Japan>collapsed economy
Britain>collapsed economy by war and couldn,t keep colony.
Many colony of European>independent.

VICTOR of world>US
July 17th, 2013  
papasha408
 
The war would have continued for a year or a little more. But the outcome would have been a German defeat. Germany would not have beat the Soviet Union. But European geography may have been very different. Europe except for Great Britain would have been part of the Soviet sphere. Germany wouldn't have had nukes. Their research was going down a dead end street. The world would have been a much more dangerous place under this scenario.
August 5th, 2013  
Machiavelli
 
Germany beats GB then attacks USSR

Wonder about that line, i mean its obivous this happens: Germany would have beaten the USSR and then Britain

Of course, only, if Germany managed to beat and hold USSR. Could have been a endless Verdun style war there too. With half of the USSR and its resources under Nazi-Germany control and Stalin successfully defending his part of the USSR. Its not as small as europe.

Hitler never invested a lot of resources in beating GB and wasn't politically interested to invade it either, tried to negoate instead, he later used terror tactics that horrible failed, like the Blitz.

Actually, if france and GB wouldn't have declared war on germany he wouldn't even moved west. The allies as ww1 victors were too sure to win and payed the price. And hitler's real war on the east front was delayed. Would be interesting to know what would happened if GB and France wouldn't have declared war on nazi germany after they invaded poland. Some military historican said, in 1939 hitlers war machine was still not ready to declare war on the USSR. Not sure if this is true, afaik it was at its peek probably, in comparission to other countries?