Worst Pieces of Crap That Have Ever Been Issued: 1. Rifles

Dean

Active member
Every time I come here, which, according to my wife, is far too often, I read about how this weapon or that weapon is the best ever fielded. Well, I decided that it was time to have some fun at the expense of those poor sots who had to deal with pieces of kit or weapons that turned out to be total POC! (pieces of crap). What I would like to do is to start a thread wherein we will discuss the worst stuff out there and try to come to a decision as to which was the worst ever in the category that we are discussing. In order to make the contest useful, I would also like it if everyone followed a few simple rules.

1. The POC in question must have been issued as standard in at least one army.

2. Note the word "standard". The POC in question cannot have been experimental, either in designation or in nature.

3. You must give a good explanation why the weapon in question is truly a POC.

4. I can't think of anything else at the moment.

Now, to decide the worst, seeing as I started the thread, I have decided that I will be the judge, but if this works out even half decently, I would like to invite some of the regulars as a sort of ad-hoc jury, particularly with regards to weapons categories that I know next to nothing about.

With that, let the games begin. As POC number one, I humbly propose the Ross Rifle. This weapon began as a sporting rifle in Canada, and it was different from others for two reasons: 1 was it's incredible accuracy. It was more accurate out of the box than any of it's competitors. 2. It was one of the first straight-pull designs, which allowed the user to reload much fastor than if using other contemporary rifles.
However, it had a severe problem: If the weapon was not kept spotlessly clean it would catastrophically malfunction. (Sound familiar?) If any dirt got into the bolt or chamber, the bolt would not close properly, but the weapon could fire. Firing under those conditions would sent the bolt straight back into the face of the firer. Moreover, the user could not tell if the bolt was completely closed or not. In the trenches of WW I, keeping any rifle that clean was impossible. When the scope of the problem was revealed, which did not take long, Canadian soldiers were allowed to scrounge Lee-Enfields in any way they could, and Canada officially adopted the Lee-Enfield as Canada's combat rifle.

Dean.
 
Last edited:
The early rifles had many problems; I have heard many horror stories such as that the plastic would melt when cam cream and insect repellant was applied, that the rear upper receiver and trigger mechanism housing were made of such poor strength that you could squeeze the walls together and prevent the bolt carrier from travelling down the recoil rod assembly. I have heard that the top cover was made so flimsily that it was common practice to tape it down to prevent it opening randomly during firing, even that the lack of a magazine release catch guard meant that the magazine would often release itself when making contact with your webbing! The list goes on.... What has to be remembered is that the rifle is not a bad idea as such but more a good idea gone bad, for it is essentially an American (British Sterling made) AR18 'widowmaker' (as called by the IRA) switched into bullpup configuration. It is a wonder how such a highly competent company as Enfield Small Arms (producers of the old SMLE and more recent SLR battle rifles) could turn such a good rifle as the AR18 into such a compact and heavy paperweight! It should be noted that both the German G36 and the Japanese Type 89 assault rifles are also based on the AR18, and both are fine rifles, the G36 in particular showing great success on the export market.
It is reported the weapon has undergone 83 modifications in 18 years!
 
Thanks, Sven. I've heard a lot about those. Any other takers out there?

Dean.

Btw, in this one, we're talking about rifles. We'll do other weapons, including pistols later.
 
I must agree with you Dean, in reguards to the Ross Rifle. It was a great design and idea but like you said if the rifle had one little speck of dirt the breech would not close and when fired it would fly open. At this point I can't really think of any other POC rifle.
 
Well if you want a rifle that can be badly mistreated and still fire then go for the AK 47, you can throw it around in the desert let a lorry run over it then pick it it up and fire it. The only thing it does not have is the accuracy of some of the western rifles, but it is still a great bit of kit.
 
Well, the worst ever issued weapon in my opinion was the French Chauchat. WORST PIECE OF HUMAN FILTH EVER ISSUED.
 
CanadianCombat said:
I must agree with you Dean, in reguards to the Ross Rifle. It was a great design and idea but like you said if the rifle had one little speck of dirt the breech would not close and when fired it would fly open. At this point I can't really think of any other POC rifle.

Actually, I can, but I was wondering if anyone else would come up with them. Unfortunately very few people outside of Canada have heard of the Ross, so I can't blame them for not mentioning it. But when I went to the new Canadian War Museum in Ottawa, I met a kindly old gent who had used one, and he took the time to explain it all in great detail. He alone made it worth the visit. He actually liked it, but he did not think it was a good combat rifle, but a GREAT sporting one.

Dean.
 
Last edited:
I've sold two Ross Rifles. And I'm outside of Canada. It's a wondeful rifle for hunting and sports' shooting. A horrible combat rifle, but still it was just a beautiful design.
 
Well, we have 2 entries, the original Enfield SA 80 and the Ross rifle. I am going to pick the Ross as the winner of the PoC award, simply because the SA 80 did become a good rifle after Heckler and Kock got their hands on it. The Ross was simply abandoned in favour of the Lee-Enfield, which was not as accurate, but far safer.... for the firer. On to the next thread!!!

Dean.
 
Actually, I can, but I was wondering if anyone else would come up with them. Unfortunately very few people outside of Canada have heard of the Ross, so I can't blame them for not mentioning it. But when I went to the new Canadian War Museum in Ottawa, I met a kindly old gent who had used one, and he took the time to explain it all in great detail. He alone made it worth the visit. He actually liked it, but he did not think it was a good combat rifle, but a GREAT sporting one.

Dean.

Umm - wasn't the Ross issued to the Home Guard early on?
 
The Ross was simply abandoned in favour of the Lee-Enfield, which was not as accurate, but far safer.... for the firer.

Dean.
I think that the only possible reason the Ross was more accurate (which I doubt) than the Lee Enfield was the fact that it was so damned long you could poke the muzzle in the enemy's ear before squeezing off a shot.
 
WORST WEAPON ISSUED IS AK-47

IT JAMS EASY AND IS NOT RELIABLE!!!

Haha joking

Im not sure, each weapon is unique and better than others in its own way.
 
I agree with the Ross and the SA80. I would however, like to add another one, the Lee Enfield Number5 Mk1 often called the Jungle Carbine.

The rifle had a wandering zero, heavy recoil and a muzzle flash that would blind the firer in low light conditions. The rifle was intended to become Britains new service rifle, over 251,000 examples were built. Production was started in 1944 and stopped in 1947. Both the Number 1 Mk3* and the Number 4 Mk2 were far better rifles then the Number 5 Mk1.

I believe Australia built their own version based on the Number 1 action, I dont know if their version fared any better.

I was interested on the comments regarding the M9 version of the Beretta.

South Africa built its own version called the Vektor Z88 as well as closed off slide versions called the SP1 (9mm Para) and the SP2 (40 S&W). I have had a number of all three pistols brought in for repair due to breakage of the locking block lugs when used with military or other “hot” ammunition.

I also heard or read somewhere that the US Army were replacing the slides of their M9's every 1000 rounds, another thing I read was that a company was producing closed slides for the M9's due to slide cracking. Any info on this?

In all honesty IMHO a better pistol would be either the CZ75, Browning Hi-Power or the good old 1911 45 ACP.
 
Last edited:
I also heard or read somewhere that the US Army were replacing the slides of their M9's every 1000 rounds, another thing I read was that a company was producing closed slides for the M9's due to slide cracking. Any info on this?

In all honesty IMHO a better pistol would be either the CZ75, Browning Hi-Power or the good old 1911 45 ACP.

I do know that in the 80's on the Gen-1 M9's it was a problem. Mainly in training commands and I believe it was upwards of 10,000 rounds when the hair line cracks were becoming a problem.

Since then I haven't heard much about it and don't recall seeing any bulletins recently.
 
Back
Top