White House never told of pre-Iraq war intelligence doubts

Team Infidel

Forum Spin Doctor
LONDON, Dec 17 (AFP) - The US administration was never told of doubts about
the secret intelligence used to justify war with Iraq, former secretary of
state Colin Powell told the BBC in an interview to be broadcast Sunday.

Powell, who argued the case for military action against Saddam Hussein in
the UN in 2003, told BBC News 24 television he was "deeply disappointed in
what the intelligence community had presented to me and to the rest of us."

"What really upset me more than anything else was that there were people in
the intelligence community that had doubts about some of this sourcing, but
those doubts never surfaced to us," he said.

Powell's comments follow US President George W. Bush's acceptance earlier
this week of responsibility for going to war on intelligence, much of which
"turned out to be wrong".

US involvement in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion has led to the loss of
2,140 of its troops and badly hit the Republican president's popularity.

The opposition Democrats have increased calls for a timetable for a military
withdrawal.

But ahead of this week's parliamentary elections in Iraq, Bush insisted he
was still right to order the invasion and argued a hurried withdrawal would
be "a recipe for disaster".

The British government -- Washington's key allies in the invasion -- has
similarly refused to give a withdrawal date for its 8,000 or so troops in
Iraq's four southern states, although has said it could happen next year.

For his part, Powell considered the US military could not be deployed in
Iraq at its current strength for years to come, raising the possibility of
withdrawal from next year.

But he told the BBC that "essentially just to walk away, to say that we're
taking all of our troops out as fast as we can, would be a tragic mistake".
A US presence would be required in Iraq for "years", he added.

"We've invested a great deal in this country, and the Iraqi people deserve
democracy and the freedom that they were promised when we got rid of Saddam
Hussein and we have to stay with them... until they decide that they can get
it now on their own, they don't need us any longer," he added.

"And even then, I suspect, there will be a continuing relationship and
presence of some significance for some years to come."

In the interview, Powell confirmed that White House "hawks" US
Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had
bypassed him and other colleagues on occasions.

Powell's former chief-of-staff Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson made the damning
allegations last month, accusing Cheney and Rumsfeld of running a "cabal"
and hijacking US military and foreign policy.

Discussions with Rumsfeld about dealing with the aftermath of the Iraq
invasion were "not pleasant", Powell admitted in the interview.
 
What else could Powell say? He was one of the most ardent supporters of Bush's decision to invade Iraq and was in on just about every single strategy session that was held leading up to the invasion itself.

Questions WERE raised about the intelligence information midway through the discussions at the cabinet level. (Unconfirmed sources as reported by media outlets).

Unconfirmed sources stated that Bush, Powell and other cabinet members CHOSE to ignore this information as being too "tenuous" in nature. Leaks hint that this information source was a little stronger than insiders really liked - it didn't fit in with the justification reasons being generated to explain an unprovoked invasion.

Based upon just the above "leaked" information, the inevitable conclusion has to be that Powell stretched the truth during his interview with BBC News 24 television.

(I apologize for not being able to give better sources. This information was gleaned from much surfing of the net (media sites). The Bush Whitehouse has the reputation of being one of the most "closed" administrations in US history and confirmed sources are hard to find - even for the major media outlets and reporters).
 
Back
Top