![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
See, here's the thing, Hitler would not have been able to defeat the United States, what besides my patriotism could provoke such a statement you ask? Well I don't know but I do have a justification.
Quote:
Now, I read the first few pages of "In The Presense of Mine Enemies" by Harry Turtledove and although I have always likes his work I had to put the book back and buy another one. In the first few pages it stated that the United States paid a yearly tribute to Germany to presumably pay for their "protection" because Germany had several bases on American soil and "the Americans would complain but they would still pay, if not the Panzers in those bases would start rolling out." Now, let me explain something to everyone here, Americans did not want to become involved with WWII because it wasn't our war, it was a European war, let them deal with, but once it became our war started kicking ![]() BTW, Ollie Garchy, the questions is "If Hitler had won WWII" keyword: world. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Oh man, you guys are confused. This is not a Nazi Germany vs USA thread, this has already happened.
The thread asks: "What would the world be like if Hitler had won?". It means guessing the US, UK and USSR combined were not able to defeat Hitler. No nukes, nothing. Now, what would the world be like??? That is the thread. I mean it might prove hard for Americans to even imagine such a scenario but this is an effort of fantasy and imagination. Come on. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
RESPONSE TO "BTW, Ollie Garchy, the questions is "If Hitler had won WWII" keyword: world".
(1) The US had 2 nukes in August 1945 with more in production. Good point, however, the mythical German invasion of the United States was a non-starter. (2) The German military was incapable of an attack against the United States...nor did any real planning exist. For godsakes, no real planning for an invasion of Britain existed until military realities pressed the issue. German generals generally abhored the idea. So did Hitler...who, if you read what he stated, wanted a continental German empire alongside the British empire. This being the case, physical world domination has no place in serious discourse...it is just folklore. Nor did Nazi theory even advance the idea. All of the bizarre arguments supposing Hitler's quest for world domination forget the following: Hitler defined world domination in the sense of the British Empire...ie. a core region that extended great power influence into the periphery. THEREFORE, any thinking concerning a Nazi world has to agree that a large German core region would have dominated Europe and exerted a tremendous pull on global affairs. Forget such stupid notions as global genocide or other ridiculous concepts that no Nazi even entertained. In fact, Nazi theory seemed more akin to American developments and the creation of a unipolar world system. Aborginal genocide + Continenal expansion built on slavery + Monroe Doctrine + Truman Doctrine + Bush. Empires use compliant states to cement their power. There is no evidence to suggest that the Nazis rejected the assistance of allies. Actually, the evidence suggests that the opposite was true. Read Stoakes, "Hitler and the Quest for World Domination". |
![]() |