US and Russian air fighters - Page 3




 
--
 
June 12th, 2006  
zander_0633
 
 
Well, the Su-47 sure have it's killer looks! Remains me of the aircraft in X-Men!

Is it possible to fit the Su with Us engines? If it is possible, then that bird sure has killer looks and killer power!
June 12th, 2006  
Senior Chief
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabs
That wouldnt be becaused they "borrowed" some of our ideas would it. No, never.
Actually there is a high probabability that it was a two way trade off. I think we might have done a little spying in the day as well!
June 12th, 2006  
SwordFish_13
 
 

Hi,

If we are Only Considering Looks .... Russian Birds Beat Everyone hands Down


^
An Indian SU 30 MKI
--
June 12th, 2006  
Senior Chief
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwordFish_13
Hi,

If we are Only Considering Looks .... Russian Birds Beat Everyone hands Down


Picture removed.

An Indian SU 30 MKI
I think each person may have a different outlook on the subject.

Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder!
June 12th, 2006  
AussieNick
 
Nobody is right so you can't debate this.
Just give your opinions on the LOOKS!!!
It is a subjective matter, so don't treat it like it's not.
And for the record, right on Bulldogg. Looks can't kill.
June 12th, 2006  
Rabs
 
 
Quote:
Looks can't kill.
You've aparently never seen my mother in the mornings.
June 12th, 2006  
Easy-8
 
 
The F-23 the aircraft which lost to the F-22. However most people say it was by far the better looking of the two aircraft.

June 12th, 2006  
Rabs
 
 
It is sleek.
June 12th, 2006  
Senior Chief
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy-8
The F-23 the aircraft which lost to the F-22. However most people say it was by far the better looking of the two aircraft.
But was it functional?
June 12th, 2006  
Rabs
 
 
Quote:
But was it functional?
What do you mean? It just didnt fill the needs the air force wanted. I think there were some slight problems with the weapon bays but I it was functional.