boris116
Active member
Тhere is something apparently missing from this statement:All very good.
And if the invasion had happened on those grounds a very worthy cause.
But it didn´t, did it?
Fact:
The invasion was planned and executed on the wrongful assumption that Iraq had WMD,s, no WMD,s have been located.
Iraq COULD HAVE destroyed ALL her chemical weapons AND re-create them in very short period of time!
I was wandering all these years why such a simple idea has never been popular with the media?
Now, in his book about the war, the former undersecreary of Defence Douglas J. Feith
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/105-4192183-0645212?%5Fencoding=UTF8&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=Douglas%20J.%20Feith
wrote that in the CIA report has been mentioned that Saddam could restore his WMD stockpiles in 3-5 weeks!
I have thought, it would be much longer than that.!
However, the Administration has not bother to highlight this fact buried in 400-pages report and the Media has not liked the idea of uncovering this.
To me, an ability to produce the WMD in 5 weeks after lifting of the sanctions is pretty much the same as the real stockpiles.
Am I stupid in believing in this?:sorry: