Define win - and don't dance around the issue concerning your liberal leaning press.
:rambo:
Oh, the "Liberal Press" myth again. If someone disagrees with conservatives its therefore "liberal", especially when it happens to be true, then its called the "far-left" liberal media.
I'll ask you the same question as I asked everybody else who repeats this tired old line. If the press is so "Liberal" then how come most of it, (especially the mainstream media) it is owned by conservatives? Don't believe me? check who owns MSNBC (Gates), FOX (Murdoch), CBS (Time-Warner), ABC (Disney), ClearChannel, CNN (Time-Warner) (which owns
10% of radio airwaves in the US), the WSJ (Murdoch), the WT (Rev Sun Yi Moon), just to name a few.
I'll give a factoid: The popular myth of the "liberal" press was actually invented by Rupert Ailes in the FOX NEWS boileroom.
"Repeat a lie often enough and eventually people will believe it"
-Dr. Joseph Goebbels
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13th Redneck
Except in all those examples the US had a strategy, an actual plan to win the war. The current gameplan is "Win the war against global terrorism". AKA: A war without end. The Iraq war has been going on longer than WWII with no end in sight.
The only reason we are still in Iraq is become our leaders
THE REPUBLICANS, and a few Chickenhawk Democrats cannot come to grips with the fact that they were wrong, and of course certain Corporate interests that are unwilling to let go of their moneyfactory. 25% of the Worlds oil supply is a hard thing to give up, you know.
Alan Greenspan (a Republican who served as FRC for 5 different presidents) has publically acknowledged that the war WAS for oil (and a few other reasons) that had nothing to do with WMD or terrorism.