ASTRALdragon
Active member
The post by Marinerhodes made me think about this. Btw, Chief Bones's reply to that thread made me chuckle a bit about how useless the UN is in world affairs, which I 200% agree with.
I think it's safe to assume that 9/10 of us agree that the UN is in need of some serious reform/restructuring. The current UN is a relic of the post-World War II era, which the world has moved beyond (except for China and both Koreas who are still mad that they got owned by a smaller country). What types of reforms would you suggest the UN take to insure that they are still a world body? Should there be new positions? Less positions? A new building perhaps? How about a catchy motto?
Personally, I think Japan and the rest of the G4 (I think that's what they called themselves) should be given strong consideration to be given a spot on the SC (the veto-carrying spots). If I could add more to it, I'd add Japan, Germany, Brazil, and South Africa. Actually, I'd let the African nations nominate one of their own to represent them all.
Post away guys! I want to read excellent posts from you intellects! :jump:
I think it's safe to assume that 9/10 of us agree that the UN is in need of some serious reform/restructuring. The current UN is a relic of the post-World War II era, which the world has moved beyond (except for China and both Koreas who are still mad that they got owned by a smaller country). What types of reforms would you suggest the UN take to insure that they are still a world body? Should there be new positions? Less positions? A new building perhaps? How about a catchy motto?
Personally, I think Japan and the rest of the G4 (I think that's what they called themselves) should be given strong consideration to be given a spot on the SC (the veto-carrying spots). If I could add more to it, I'd add Japan, Germany, Brazil, and South Africa. Actually, I'd let the African nations nominate one of their own to represent them all.
Post away guys! I want to read excellent posts from you intellects! :jump: