Will the Ucaf take the roll over from real pilots.
Not sure if there is or was a thread like this
Hello tommy_gunn,
Not from all - unless one day this whole planet is going to be run by one master-computer and a billion robots.
The main difference IMHO, is that most of the pilots will stay on ground - remote, satellite - controlling a UCAV that is assigned to him or right now already up to 50 units. Or from an airborne command centre respectivly from an accompaning fighter aircraft.
The USAF is already training far more ground controllers then pilots.
Groundtroop support, recon and strike missions can be easily conducted via a UCAV fighter or bomber. Basically a Global Hawk or Eurohawk or a Barracuda in its present test mode isn't doing much of a different job. A dogfight would be a different issue since the technical requirements would certainly outway a pilot in $ by a very far stretch.
The issue right now is, if a ground based - or remote pilot will display the same attention and concentration as a pilot that is onboard an aircraft. There is a huge difference in a persons attitude and aptitude towards flying in real or basically running a real time computer game. Like " if it's going down" it won't be me inside.
The "multifunction" is also a major issue in regards to international law.
These kind of issues can cost billions and endanger a mission status - so a lot will depend on the kind of psychological and situation awareness training. - the remote jockey's will receive. Furthermore advanced UCAV's or drones and especially UCAF's need satellite assistance - just an inertial navigation system or radio guidance is not enough.
And every military on this planet for the past fifteen years is thinking about how to knock those satellites out, or to disable them. A conventional pilot is still able to fullfill a mission without datalinks via satellites. I am quite confident that within the next ten years it will be possible to obtain the algorithms needed to translate a RaSigma/AMI equation into a computerised reading - this automatically will lead to dissableing measures towards datalinks, video relay and the antenna positioning on aircrafts or UCAV's. A UCAV would be totally unable to conduct its mission without a remote access. A directly piloted aircraft would be strongly hampered but still able to conduct it's mission to a certain degree.
So I would say that the "real" future of ACAV's / ACAF's and conventional pilots strongly depends on the progress in regards to a computerised RaSigma/AMI reading.
It's like first the untrackable aircraft - then radar - then steallth - and then RaSigna/EMI reading - and then? back to doubledeckers :smile:
Regards
Kruska