Team Infidel
Forum Spin Doctor
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
November 13, 2007
Pg. 1
By Robert Burns, Associated Press
Washington--The first big test of security gains linked to the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq is at hand.
The military has started to reverse the 30,000-strong troop increase, and commanders are hoping the drop in insurgent and sectarian violence in recent months--achieved at the cost of hundreds of lives--won't prove fleeting.
The current total of 20 combat brigades is shrinking to 19 as the 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, operating in volatile Diyala province, leaves. The U.S. command in Baghdad announced on Saturday that the brigade had begun heading home to Fort Hood, Texas, and that its battle space would be taken by another brigade already operating in Iraq.
Between January and July--on a schedule not yet made public--the force is to shrink further to 15 brigades. The total number of U.S. troops probably will go from 167,000 now to 140,000-145,000 by July, six months before President Bush leaves office and a new commander in chief enters the White House.
As the U.S. troop reductions proceed, it should become clear whether the "surge" strategy that increased the U.S. troop presence in and around Baghdad resulted in any lasting gains.
Critics note the divided government in Baghdad has made few, if any, strides toward political reconciliation, which Washington has said is crucial to stabilizing the country.
The acceleration of the U.S. mission away from direct combat to more of a support role will put greater pressure on Iraqi security forces to bear more of the load. And it will test the durability of new U.S. alliances with neighborhood watch groups springing up with surprising speed.
Declines in Iraqi civilian and U.S. military casualties in the past few months and talk among U.S. commanders of an emerging air of optimism and civic revival in some Baghdad neighborhoods point to positive security trends.
Although more U.S. troops have died in Iraq this year--at least 856--than in any year since the 2003 U.S. invasion, the monthly count has declined substantially since summer. Iraqi civilian deaths also have declined. At least 3,861 Americans have died in the Iraq war.
A key question is whether security will slip once U.S. lines thin and whether Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq and orchestrator of the counterinsurgency strategy, has made enough inroads against insurgents--and instilled enough hope in ordinary Iraqis--to make the gains stick.
U.S. commanders assert it is not just the larger number of U.S. troops that has made a difference but also the way those troops operate--closer to the Iraqi population rather than from big, isolated U.S. bases. Living among the Iraqis, they say, allows trust to develop.
That trust, in turn, has prompted more local Iraqis--mostly Sunni Arabs, but also some Shiites--to join U.S. forces in anti-insurgent alliances, the commanders say. It also has meant more Iraqi help in finding insurgents' arms caches, reducing mortar attacks and uncovering roadside bombs before they detonate.
Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, who has assessed the situation for Petraeus, said a key reason for recent security gains is the emergence of the local anti-insurgent alliances--not just in Anbar province where they began early this year but also now in and around Baghdad. A key to sustaining those security gains will be the U.S. military's ability to police those alliances, he said.
"It's happening on a large-scale basis throughout much of the country," Biddle said. "The problem is how do you keep them from either [switching] sides again or from going to war against each other."
Also important is whether Iraqi security forces are ready to take over from U.S. troops. If they are not, Petraeus' strategy could fail and the whole U.S. enterprise in Iraq could unravel. The issue is not whether the Iraqi army and police have adequate training; it's whether they are willing to use their training to enforce order without perpetuating the sectarian divides.
Brig. Gen. Stephen Gledhill, the second-in-command for training Iraqi forces, says he is confident that conditions have improved to the point where the Iraqis are capable of filling any U.S. gaps. "Our answer is that they not only will be able to--they already are and will continue to do so as they gain experience, capabilities and capacity," he said.
November 13, 2007
Pg. 1
By Robert Burns, Associated Press
Washington--The first big test of security gains linked to the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq is at hand.
The military has started to reverse the 30,000-strong troop increase, and commanders are hoping the drop in insurgent and sectarian violence in recent months--achieved at the cost of hundreds of lives--won't prove fleeting.
The current total of 20 combat brigades is shrinking to 19 as the 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, operating in volatile Diyala province, leaves. The U.S. command in Baghdad announced on Saturday that the brigade had begun heading home to Fort Hood, Texas, and that its battle space would be taken by another brigade already operating in Iraq.
Between January and July--on a schedule not yet made public--the force is to shrink further to 15 brigades. The total number of U.S. troops probably will go from 167,000 now to 140,000-145,000 by July, six months before President Bush leaves office and a new commander in chief enters the White House.
As the U.S. troop reductions proceed, it should become clear whether the "surge" strategy that increased the U.S. troop presence in and around Baghdad resulted in any lasting gains.
Critics note the divided government in Baghdad has made few, if any, strides toward political reconciliation, which Washington has said is crucial to stabilizing the country.
The acceleration of the U.S. mission away from direct combat to more of a support role will put greater pressure on Iraqi security forces to bear more of the load. And it will test the durability of new U.S. alliances with neighborhood watch groups springing up with surprising speed.
Declines in Iraqi civilian and U.S. military casualties in the past few months and talk among U.S. commanders of an emerging air of optimism and civic revival in some Baghdad neighborhoods point to positive security trends.
Although more U.S. troops have died in Iraq this year--at least 856--than in any year since the 2003 U.S. invasion, the monthly count has declined substantially since summer. Iraqi civilian deaths also have declined. At least 3,861 Americans have died in the Iraq war.
A key question is whether security will slip once U.S. lines thin and whether Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq and orchestrator of the counterinsurgency strategy, has made enough inroads against insurgents--and instilled enough hope in ordinary Iraqis--to make the gains stick.
U.S. commanders assert it is not just the larger number of U.S. troops that has made a difference but also the way those troops operate--closer to the Iraqi population rather than from big, isolated U.S. bases. Living among the Iraqis, they say, allows trust to develop.
That trust, in turn, has prompted more local Iraqis--mostly Sunni Arabs, but also some Shiites--to join U.S. forces in anti-insurgent alliances, the commanders say. It also has meant more Iraqi help in finding insurgents' arms caches, reducing mortar attacks and uncovering roadside bombs before they detonate.
Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, who has assessed the situation for Petraeus, said a key reason for recent security gains is the emergence of the local anti-insurgent alliances--not just in Anbar province where they began early this year but also now in and around Baghdad. A key to sustaining those security gains will be the U.S. military's ability to police those alliances, he said.
"It's happening on a large-scale basis throughout much of the country," Biddle said. "The problem is how do you keep them from either [switching] sides again or from going to war against each other."
Also important is whether Iraqi security forces are ready to take over from U.S. troops. If they are not, Petraeus' strategy could fail and the whole U.S. enterprise in Iraq could unravel. The issue is not whether the Iraqi army and police have adequate training; it's whether they are willing to use their training to enforce order without perpetuating the sectarian divides.
Brig. Gen. Stephen Gledhill, the second-in-command for training Iraqi forces, says he is confident that conditions have improved to the point where the Iraqis are capable of filling any U.S. gaps. "Our answer is that they not only will be able to--they already are and will continue to do so as they gain experience, capabilities and capacity," he said.