Stanford beating USC wasn't the greatest upset of all time, I don't even consider it that great of an upset, it was one very bad team doing their homework and beating a good team on the road. USC is over-rated, they have been for a couple years now, the reason is that they are in such a weak conference. The Pac-10 has fallen behind the Big Ten, SEC, Big East and Big XII in recent years, this year could prove to be an exception since Cal and Oregon are playing so well. USC got an automatic BCS birth the last five seasons by simply being being a big fish in a medium size pond. Remember when ESPN did that "Road to History" thing or whatever where they compared the 2005 USC Trojans to the "Ten Best Football Teams of All-Time" which of course every college football fan knows the list was BS because the number 1 team of all-time
is the 1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers followed closely by the 1971 Nebraska Cornhuskers, yet the '71 team wasn't on the list and '95 Neb. was ranked third. USC, with its two Heisman winners, lost to Texas in the 2005 national championship game. This upset isn't as big as people are making it sound because USC isn't as good as people make them sound. When I read articles about USC today I would think they had been on the verge of surpassing OU's record for consecutive wins when this happened or that USC had won four of the last five National Championships, when they're really only won one and that was against the third ranked team in the nation when Auburn should have been the ones playing USC.
Michigan loses to two-time defending Div-1AA champion Appalachian State and drops from 5th to unranked, USC loses to a team that finished 1-11 the previous season when they were a 41 point favorite and stays in the top ten. Hmm, bias? Oh it's ok, they're USC, they get a second chance. And now of course USC will be ushered to the front of the line for the one loss teams, yet if LSU loses one game they are out of the race for the NC, same with Ohio State, Cal and Boston College.