Thats what I am talking about - Page 2




 
--
Boots
 
March 30th, 2006  
Ted
 
 
Well the latin titles are quite original imo. Gives a little "cachet" to the public!
March 30th, 2006  
phoenix80
 
 
the titles are fine!
March 30th, 2006  
MightyMacbeth
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
That's correct.
I was also thinking about using Chivalry related ranks in the forum, and they would have looked something like this:
Chivalry:
Peasant
Man at Arms
Squire
Knight
duke
marquess
earl
viscount
baron
prince
king

wait wait wait... I think you need to rivise and check that your correct heh.. Check again who is higher than who

and I think these ranks are nicer than the latin ones 8)


Anyway, Price? naah, that would be Redlegs son lol...
--
Boots
March 30th, 2006  
sunb!
 
 
Didn't you use "The Duke of Milforum" once earlier? Well Duke, remember God created Sunb! on the 8th day
March 30th, 2006  
MightyMacbeth
 
 
lol, yeah I used the title and here I am again.

And pleased to know that sunb!, pleased to know that.. 8)
March 30th, 2006  
Redleg
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyMacbeth
wait wait wait... I think you need to rivise and check that your correct heh.. Check again who is higher than who
I know that some of them should be the other way around..

Correct order:

baron
viscount
earl
marquess
duke

10 points to you for noticing it..
But Duke is still under Prince..
March 30th, 2006  
fronzz
 
 
Thatd be cool.
March 30th, 2006  
MightyMacbeth
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
I know that some of them should be the other way around..

Correct order:

baron
viscount
earl
marquess
duke

10 points to you for noticing it..
But Duke is still under Prince..
heh, 10?? ty ty

And yeah, Duke is high in rank. I know lower than the prince lol.. But Duke is fine enough, prince aint for me 8)
March 31st, 2006  
Ted
 
 
I said I liked the current Latin approach. Does that make me elligable for 10 points too?
March 31st, 2006  
MightyMacbeth
 
 
heh, beging now arent we? lol 8)