![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Topic: T-34(85) wasnt Red Army's only tank...![]() Actually, it is not right to compare T34(which was developed before the war began) with later german tanks like PzKpfw V "Panther" modifications, not because Panhter was developed later, but simply beacause Panther was a DIFFERENT CLASS OF TANK. T-34 was a medium tank, Panther was a heavy tank. So, it would be right to compare Panther with an IS-2 tank. And panther is clearly loosing to the IS-2, both in armor terms and in arnament. For example, Panther Ausf G(latest mod of Panther) had 75mm KwK gun, and IS2 had 122!mm gun. Also, Panther had gaseline engine, while IS2 had diesel. Only real advantage panther had was greater speed(because of more powerful enginge). If anybody wants, I can translate detailed charts of both Panther and IS2. All data was taken from http://armor.kiev.ua/ |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Topic: Re: T-34(85) wasnt Red Army's only tank...Quote:
I don't think it's fair to compare the Panther with the IS-2. I think you're in the minority when calling the Panther a heavy tank because although fairly heavy at 45 tons or so, it's armor protection and gun clearly put it in the medium class tank category. Plus the Wehrmacht already had the Tiger 1 in service that was heavier and had better armor protection and obviously the 88mm gun. If you really want to compare the IS-2 with a german tank it would be the Tiger 1. I think the IS-2 is one of the unsung tank designs of WW2 - IMO it was a very good tank and a better tank than the Koenigstiger but inferior to the Tiger 1. It was never the best tank of WW2, that honour still going to the Panther G with the Tiger 1 second and the T34/85 third. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
http://members.aol.com/xbutchx/soviet.html
heres the pictures of some of the tanks mentioned in the string..enjoy |
![]() |