Stem Cell Research - Page 4




 
--
Boots
 
June 12th, 2006  
mmarsh
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missileer
I know Dr. Mengele would have loved to have dabbled in it. President Bush took a stand against it because of his and his constituants' personal belief that it is wrong. The fact that he expresses his convictions about something and stands firm just gets under the liberals' skin. They're not equipped to deal with a person who makes a firm stand.
Oh I just love that reasoning. Why dont we just end medical research all together because it might happen to coinicide with the pychotic teaching of Dr Mengele, Dr Frankenstein, and Dr Who. And the same time, why dont we just abolish the military just in case we get the same ideas of Adolf Hitler and start invade other countries for no good reason. (Whoops! too late...)

And lets talk about Bush's constituents (the few he has left). They are a very small but very vocal group of religous fanatics who like all fanatics be they Muslim, Christian or hari chrishna will not rest until they have forcefed their TOTALLY WARPED religous beliefs on whole of society. These beliefs are generally so extreme that even other Christians have a hard time swallowing it.

And finally this issue isnt about Liberal vs Conservative just ask Bill Frist (that Damn liberal...). He totally opposed to Bush on this issue as are most Conservatives on this issue. Bush's political beliefs? Please, He has none. He is the head butt-boy of every single conservative special interest group in Washington. For all his macho BS, he is totally spineless. Just look how he got killed on the 9/11 commision, Harriet Miers, the ports Scandal and so on. Bush cannot even control his own party, its pathetic. He got run over worse than Wiley E. Coyote. The real truth is, like gay marriage, flag burning and a whole host of worthless issues, this was done to throw a bone to his political base, but like with the Schivo matter, old Turd Blossem (Bush's pet name for Karl Rove) totally miscalculated the public reaction to banning Stem research.
June 15th, 2006  
Mohmar Deathstrike
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenarmy1980
Since when did the Church run government? Limiting stem cell research and what is possible was all based on Religion.

Seems that when George W. Bush limited stem cell research and utilization he was taking into account what the religions of the world have been saying, and now they are actually thinking about returning to government funding of the research and lifting restrictions. Is this because he cannot be reelected?

What are your thoughts?
Germany is even more retarded: It's okay to kill embryos, but not to do stem cell research on them once they're deat. WTF?

Question to "pro-choice-people": Why is it okay to kill a fetus but not a baby?
June 15th, 2006  
DefiantCdr
 
 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenarmy1980
Since when did the Church run government? Limiting stem cell research and what is possible was all based on Religion.

Seems that when George W. Bush limited stem cell research and utilization he was taking into account what the religions of the world have been saying, and now they are actually thinking about returning to government funding of the research and lifting restrictions. Is this because he cannot be reelected?

What are your thoughts?
Germany is even more retarded: It's okay to kill embryos, but not to do stem cell research on them once they're deat. WTF?

That's a bit odd. Society can't condone abortion and refuse to allow embryonic research... without being highly hypocritical, that is.
--
Boots
June 16th, 2006  
mmarsh
 
 
Question to "pro-choice-people": Why is it okay to kill a fetus but not a baby?

Its not OK, but sometimes killing is necessary, even killing a baby (under certain medical circumstances).
June 16th, 2006  
Mohmar Deathstrike
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmarsh
Question to "pro-choice-people": Why is it okay to kill a fetus but not a baby?

Its not OK, but sometimes killing is necessary, even killing a baby (under certain medical circumstances).
What medical circumstances could these be (for killing a born baby, not a fetus)?