Occupied lands are not your Homeland. Your homeland is that of your origin, otherwise the Homeland of most Israelis is Eastern Europe. As has been pointed out to you several times previously, you can't just hand pick at which time you want to claim a place was your homeland. The whole "homeland" thing for them is no more than religious twaddle.
Well, that origin is in southern Africa for all of us. Does that mean that that place is our homeland?
You can't pick at which time to claim a place was your homeland? That's exactly what you do!
If we want to play the Zionist game,... Yes. That is why their alleged "claim" to Palestine is fraudulent.
That's proof of your inability to give a serious answer.
Our Constitution does not contain every law pertaining to Australia it is merely a basis for our Law. I do not have access to all the laws and Acts, even full time Lawyers usually only keep such parts as are applicable to their speciality.
Another evading answer.
All claims are negotiated as per the agreement that they are party to. As your own last sentence indicates once the negotiation is completed and their claim is found to be legitimate they are granted it. Otherwise any Aboriginal group could just claim any piece of land as having been their traditional land, and there have been a number of cases of this being attempted, sometimes successfully sometimes not but they are given the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. Even the various clans and tribes dispute the boundaries of their tribal lands, many overlapped and some places still have not been claimed, virtually all inter tribal warfare was as a result of this. This disputation goes on to this day and is usually the major bottleneck in negotiations.
So your saying in post #1250 ("
that the land belongs to the Aboriginal people") is wrong.
Show me where you found that, because In fact they were always Australians, it's just that at that time they were asked if they wished to become known as that officially on all successive legal documentation.
Australian constitution Chapter VII no 127 : "
Aborigines not to be counted in reckoning population. Repealed by No. 55, 1967, s. 3"
He is when he drives the population off his land and occupies it taking his land and possessions refusing to allow his return. So, what planet is it that you live on,... as I am clearly on Earth?
But the Jews didn't do that. They settled on uninhabited land or bought the land from someone already living there. That's completely legal. They did even more, they transformed arid land into farmland and gave work to local people and immigrants from neighboring countries. Your knowledge is very selective.
Before we even start read line one of Article 6.
Only if you hold current citizenship in that homeland, I can't just roll up and move into places where my ancestors once lived, without proper documentation. Palestine was never ratified as a as a Jewish homeland though was it? It was only ever a "recommendation" as were several other places.
It was in fact occupied by illegal immigrants who deliberately drove the native population off their land. In answer to the second part of Article 6., The Brits had already clearly stated that all the land was taken and there was no "waste" land for Jews or anyone else.
EVERY citizen in the Mandate of Palestine, legal or illegal, got the same citizenship. So they also should have the same rights but the British backed down on Arab pressure and limited Jewish imigration with the fallacy that there wasn't much land anymore. At that time less than 1 million people lived there. Know more than 6 million.
Jews and "Palestinians" got the
same citizenship, same rights. So no occupation because they both lived in the same country as equal citizens. Not doing so is racism.
Enough said, there's your answer. Palestinians or Arabs living In Israel do not have this as shown almost daily tn the press
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...cond-class-citizens-in-their-own-country.html and as reported by any number of International bodies. All of which has been covered here before.
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/schools-for-jews-and-arabs-separate-but-definitely-not-equal-1.443811
Those articles, my friend, are not facts but opinions. As I have proved before there are many of your so called second class citizens who are elected to the Knesset or have high-ranking positions.
Thank you,.... so you admit that it happened. There is no excuse as to why, as the Israelis were virtually all illegal immigrants.
What a twist of the truth. The "why" is very important because it is caused by the Arabs, not the Israelis. This is a
FACT. Second, there were
no illegal immigrants living in Israel at that time.
About your wiki link, most of them
fled, as was acknowledged by the present leader of the Palestinians. I already gave you that
fact.
BTW the 1951 Refugee Convention nor the 1967 Protocol mentioned "descendant". Only the UNWRA does, because it is needed to help those too.
The land "belonged" to the Palestinians, a fact recognised by the Hussein McMahon agreement. Neither the Turks nor the Brits owned it, a fact that you got wrong last time we went through all this and you admitted it. It was "occupied" by the Turks and "Adminstered" by the Brits on behalf of the Palestinian people. They never ever owned it.
The The Hussein-McMahon Correspondence does not contain the word "Palestinian" nor "Palestine".
"Local population" is only used with regard to the vilayets of Bagdad and Basra.
"Natives" is only used 3 times with regard to supplying grain.
The word "immigrant" is not used.
FACT: The Hussein-McMahon Correspondence
does not say the land belongs to the Palestinians.
The Turks nor the British administered the land on behalf of the Palestinians. Again this is an invention from you. During the Ottoman Empire the people living in what we now call Israel and the PA was part of the province Syria. That's why your so called Palestinians called themselves Syrians untill Arafat told them to call themselves otherwise.
About the British. The mandate says :"
The Mandatory shall have full powers of legislation and of administration, save as they may be limited by the terms of this mandate."
I fully realise that you are just trying on the old Hasbara Troll ploy of endless repetition of previously disproven points, so unless you start coming up with some facts I'm going to stop answering. Virtually all that you have said has been shown to be wrong at least once before. By facts, I mean facts as recognised by the International community, not Zionist "facts".
You change fact with fiction. You have not proved anything because all you give are your or someone else's opinions. Opinions are not facts.