You do realise that the Hashemite dynasty goes back to the 5th century right?
If so your argument is that people who's religion (but who have no more racial connection to the region than the fragments of DNA you can find as background noise in 99% of the earths population) abandoned a region 3000 years ago have more right to a land than a people who have lived on the land for the last 1500 years?
The Hashemites came from the Arabian Peninsula and as such are not the native people of Jordan.
There have always been a presense of Jews in what is now called Israel/Palestine and Jerusalem was most of it's history populated by a majority of Jews. And exactly that city is choosen by the Palestinians as their capital, or should I say by muslims because they always want to destroy or capture the symbols af their "enemy".
Here is a problem your argument has displayed from day one, it is fragmented and I suspect deliberately incomplete it reminds me of the arguments used in TV shows like Ancient Aliens, you take a fragment of truth combine it with myth, legend and poor science declare it a fact and the use that "fact" to validate the next point when in reality you haven't proven the first "fact".
It is impossible to give a personal view of that conflict with a few words. I have given lots of facts and disproved a lot of lies and distorted truths here.
Show me where I used poor science, legends and myths.
So prove to us that:
A: The jews that have immigrated to the region in the last 100 years have a genetic connection to the area that is greater than that of you, I or 99% of the rest of the worlds population because I am prepared to bet that with the human race's spread world wide we all have a background noise level of middle eastern DNA.
Y-chromosomal DNA from Ashkenazi Jews (Germans) is traced back to the Middle East.
There is an abundance of proof that Jews all over the world have their roots in the Middle east.
"This supported the finding that "Diaspora Jews from Europe, Northwest Africa, and the Near East resemble each other more closely than they resemble their non-Jewish neighbors."" (Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes)
B: The the people calling themselves Palestinians do not have this.
We must divide the Palestinians into two groups
1 - those who have their roots in "Palestine" : descendants of Jewish and Christian converts (the others were expelled or killed). These are of the same lineage as the Jews.
2 - Arab Palestinians mostly come from south of the levant.
But you don't need genetics to show where some Palestinians came from. Take a telephone book and look up the familynames. Arab names point to where they came from, a few examples:
"Khamis"= from Bahrain "Salem Hanna Khamis"
"al-Ubayyidi" or "al-Obeidi"= from Sudan "al-ubayyid"
"al-Faruqi"= Mosul Iraq
"al-Araj" = Morocco, a member of the Saadi Dynasty
"al-Husayni" = Saudi Arabia
"Haddadins" = Yemen descended from Ghassanid Christian Arabs
I can give a lot more examples if you want to.
C. That the Canaanite empire was a Jewish one as Palestine was a region of said empire earlier than it was an Israelite one.
Israelites and the Canaanites lived in reasonable harmony with each other until the Philistines (not semetic and from Greek origine) invaded their land in the twelfth century bce. The Israelites and the Canaanites eventually became integrated into one people to combat a common enemy.
The first mention of the word Palestine, in fact it was Peleset, was in about 1150 BCE. Neither the Egyptian or Assyrian sources provided clear regional boundaries for the term. But let us asume it was Palestine.
The first Kingdom of Israel was established around the 11th century BCE. That's one century earlier than Peleset. (with no mention of a kingdom or whatever)
D. That the biblical account of Exodus is incorrect as that makes "Israel" a region of Egypt and the original Jews by default Egyptian.
I consider the bible as a religious book and not a historical one, although some events described in it are true.
Most sources give the date of the exodus at around 1.300 - 1.400 BCE. Some say it never existed.
Fact is, and Egyptian representations of captives proves this, that the forefathers of the Jews, called Shasu by the Egyptians, were captured when the Egyptians invaded the land where they lived (what is now Israel/Palestine). So, ancesters of Jews were living there before the Egyptians arrived otherwise the Egyptians couldn't have capture them, could they?
Basically all you have to do is prove "Jewish" is a race and not just a religion and that they were the original inhabitants of the land by proving the Canaanite empire was solely Jewish in the process you will have disprove the biblical account of Exodus (which does have some archaeological support), good luck.
There's no need to prove that "Jewish" is a race just as there is no need to prove that "Palestinan" is a race. It is very clear that muslim Palestinians are descendants of the Jews and as such do the Jews have the same claim on the land as them and more so against Arab Palestinians who didn't originate from "Israel/Palestine".
Hebrew is a Semitic language spoken by the Jewish people and one of the world’s oldest living languages. Earliest Hebrew texts date from the second millennium B.C.E. and evidence suggests that the Israelite tribes who invaded Canaan spoke Hebrew.
Their religion, Judaism, is one of the oldest monotheistic religions, and the oldest to survive into the present day, spanning more than 3.000 years.
The Hebrew calendar is used in Israel as an official calendar for civil purposes and provides a time frame for agriculture.
As you see, there's plenty of evidence of the Jewish claim to the land.
But then your dislike of the Palestinians also makes you anti-Semetic as it is a pretty wide brush you are painting with even if the term has been hijacked.
I do not dislike Palestinians, I dislike their religious fanticism and their "blame someone else" culture. It's the only society in the world who begs for a homeland and, after so many opportunities, still don't have one. Ironically, that what they do have now, for the first time ever in their history, is thanks to Israel.