I don't know if you can't read, don't read, or are just being obtuse, but what I have said is the standard practice in every first world country on earth. When a criminal is punished his family is not exempt from any side effects of that punishment, and any profit or possessions gained as a result of a crime are forfeit to their rightful owners. Like it or not, that is the law as it stands.
If you try to burn down someone else's house and the fire gets away and kills your children, you can't blame the house owner.
You obviously have not read what I said about "Kicking out" the Israelis in Post #1031, I think that it's time you started to read what I'm actually saying, instead of what you think I'm saying. It is quite clear that you are not reading what I say, so there is no purpose in me answering you again.
If the Palestinians had their land returned to them, and they had the UN support they deserve, I think that the Israelis would leave of their own free will. It would get rather cosy for the Israelis once they had been disarmed by the legitimate government and the Palestinians were allowed to return to their homes, supported by that government.
Never say never,... I remember a time when that was said of South Africa too. All it will take is for enough people to demand that their politicians get a bit of moral backbone and demand that the right thing is done.
If the UN were to have taken your attitude about what could have been realistically achieved in 1947 Israel would never have got where it is now. The only reason they have achieved what they have, is that the Zionists lied (what else)?, and always fully intended to ethnically cleanse Palestine of it's legitimate owners. Y'know what they say,... "One good turn deserves another".
I can read and I do read and I'm not being obtuse. Why would the family be blamed for the crime of one? That just doesn't sound fair. It absolutely isn't. If your brother or whatever committed a crime...why would you be blamed for it? It's not your fault, is it?? Possessions gained through crime, I agree with you. And I did state that the Palestinians take it back. You act as if I say no the Israelis keep it. You're wrong, because I did say multiple times that the Palestinians get their possessions AND land.
"If you try to burn down someone else's house and the fire gets away and kills your children, you can't blame the house owner."
I don't see what this has to do with this discussion. But yeah, I blame myself for killing my children. The house owner gets nothing to do with it.
"If the Palestinians had their land returned to them, and they had the UN support they deserve, I think that the Israelis would leave of their own free will. It would get rather cosy for the Israelis once they had been disarmed by the legitimate government and the Palestinians were allowed to return to their homes, supported by that government."
That's a possibility, sure. The Israelis would leave of their own free will....sure, we're not to be blamed. They leaved off their free will. Like this, probably they solved one of the problems by themselves.
It might not. As far as I know, the Israelis are there for religion...I guess, that if they just get the right of practicing their religion freely they would be fine. But, that's just a possibility and I could be wrong.
"If the UN were to have taken your attitude about what could have been realistically achieved in 1947 Israel would never have got where it is now. The only reason they have achieved what they have, is that the Zionists lied (what else)?, and always fully intended to ethnically cleanse Palestine of it's legitimate owners. Y'know what they say,... "One good turn deserves another"."
I'll be honest with you. I don't know about the history of Palestine/Israel. I'm only discussing the fate of the Israeli CITIZENS. But, those in the UN know the history and I can't argue their decision. The Zionists are a disgusting entity and I hate them. Maybe I don't know their history but I know mine enough to hate them.
I still remember after the 1967 war when Golda Meir said "The Sinai is now Israel and it is to be settled by Israelis." And Moshe Dayan who said "We do not need peace on paper, the peace we want was already achieved. And there's nothing now left for the Arabs except to plead for mercy."
And then the Israelis say "Oh, we gave you back the Sinai for peace!" What a bunch of bullocks!! I thought they had their peace already without paper. They just want peace by military dominance. Their theory is to be safe on the cost of surrounding states using their military.
So, please don't think for a moment that I might possibly have a glimpse of sympathy for those Zionists no matter what happens to them.