Should Women Be In The Military? - Page 31




View Poll Results :Should Women Be In The Military?
No Way! 5 2.25%
Not On The Field 52 23.42%
As Nurse, Yes 16 7.21%
Let Them Have A Go 16 7.21%
Sure, Why not? 56 25.23%
Hell Yeah! 47 21.17%
Yeah, We Need More Women As Leaders 30 13.51%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

 
--
 
March 8th, 2006  
Mohmar Deathstrike
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
Also, in the book Starship Troopers (not sure if it's true or has been disproved), they say the average male is stronger and faster, but average females have better reflexes and g-endurance, which would seem to make them better fighter pilots and such.
Yeah, see, there's a reason why they put the 'fiction'-part in 'science fiction'.

Either way, I'd say that any individual meeting physical and psychological requirements should be allowed to do any task.
March 8th, 2006  
zander_0633
 
 
yeah?!
March 8th, 2006  
PJ24
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohmar Deathstrike
Either way, I'd say that any individual meeting physical and psychological requirements should be allowed to do any task.
Regardless of how it may affect the overrall mission? By that standard, the individual and their own desires become more important than the group. That isn't healthy or wise in the military.


--
March 8th, 2006  
zander_0633
 
 
Well, sometimes, when a female is in the group, it may add a physcological mindset
March 8th, 2006  
LeEnfield
 
 
Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
March 8th, 2006  
PJ24
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
Unit cohesiveness, a biggie.

Fundamental differences in males and females, anatomically.

Male and female 18 year olds working extremely close together.

Having to rework logistics to include female needs.

...I can think of a lot of reasons. But like I said in another post, women should only be excluded from most combat arms positions. Support is fine.

March 9th, 2006  
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Basically if they can pass the same tests as a man then why not.
It's bad enough seeing a wounded "male" comrade, but it may lead to even worse psycological damage seeing a wounded "female" comrade. I have no problem with females serving in a more relaxed setting like they currently do, but having them in combat and front line units maybe a miss take. It's proven that males will more willingly protect female comrades and will linger around the female wounded, Israel tryed it.
March 9th, 2006  
LeEnfield
 
 
Cadet Seaman...If you get into combat you will see men, women and children blown to bits, along with your friends. You either learn to live with it or go nuts.
March 9th, 2006  
Mohmar Deathstrike
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ24
Regardless of how it may affect the overrall mission? By that standard, the individual and their own desires become more important than the group. That isn't healthy or wise in the military.


Then how about having all-female and all-male combat units?
March 9th, 2006  
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
Cadet Seaman...If you get into combat you will see men, women and children blown to bits, along with your friends. You either learn to live with it or go nuts.
Yes, but did you live with those people for two years, go throught hell on earth with them, or watch over them at night?