SHOULD INDIA GET A PERMANENT SEAT IN UNSC




 
--
 
February 25th, 2010  
sidewinder
 
 

Topic: SHOULD INDIA GET A PERMANENT SEAT IN UNSC


India, officially the Republic of India (Hindi: भारत गणराज्य Bhārat Gaṇarājya; see also other Indian languages), is a country in South Asia. It is the seventh-largest country by geographical area, the second-most populous country, and the most populous democracy in the world. Bounded by the Indian Ocean on the south, the Arabian Sea on the west, and the Bay of Bengal on the east, India has a coastline of 7,517 kilometres (4,700 mi). It is bordered by Pakistan to the west; China, Nepal, and Bhutan to the north; and Bangladesh and Myanmar to the east. India is in the vicinity of Sri Lanka, and the Maldives in the Indian Ocean.
Home to the Indus Valley Civilisation and a region of historic trade routes and vast empires, the Indian subcontinent was identified with its commercial and cultural wealth for much of its long history. Four major religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism originated here, while Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam arrived in the first millennium CE and shaped the region's diverse culture. Gradually annexed by the British East India Company from the early eighteenth century and colonised by the United Kingdom from the mid-nineteenth century, India became an independent nation in 1947 after a struggle for independence that was marked by widespread non-violent resistance.
The Constitution of India, the longest and the most exhaustive constitution of any independent nation in the world, came into force on 26 January 1950
Since its independence in 1947, India has maintained cordial relationships with most nations. It took a leading role in the 1950s by advocating the independence of European colonies in Africa and Asia. India was involved in two brief military interventions in neighbouring countries – Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka and Operation Cactus in Maldives. India is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations and a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement. After the Sino-Indian War and the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, India's relationship with the Soviet Union warmed and continued to remain so until the end of the Cold War. India has fought two wars with Pakistan over the Kashmir dispute. A third war between India and Pakistan in 1971 resulted in the creation of Bangladesh (then East Pakistan). Additional skirmishes have taken place between the two nations over the Siachen Glacier. In 1999, India and Pakistan fought an undeclared war over Kargil.
In recent years, India has played an influential role in the SAARC, and the WTO. India has provided as many as 55,000 Indian military and Indian police personnel to serve in thirty-five UN peace keeping operations across four continents.[14] Despite criticism and military sanctions, India has consistently refused to sign the CTBT and the NPT, although Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recently stated that India would be willing to join the NPT as a recognized nuclear weapons state (NWS). Recent overtures by the Indian government have strengthened relations with the United States, China and Pakistan. In the economic sphere, India has close relationships with other developing nations in South America, Asia and Africa.
India maintains the third-largest military force in the world, which consists of the Indian Army, Navy, Air Force and auxiliary forces such as the Paramilitary Forces, the Coast Guard, and the Strategic Forces Command. The President of India is the supreme commander of the Indian Armed Forces. India maintains close defence cooperation with Russia, Israel and France, who are the chief suppliers of arms. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) oversees indigenous development of sophisticated arms and military equipment, including ballistic missiles, fighter aircraft and main battle tanks, to reduce India's dependence on foreign imports. India became a nuclear power in 1974 after conducting an initial nuclear test, Operation Smiling Buddha and further underground testing in 1998. India maintains a "no first use" nuclear policy. On 10 October 2008 Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement was signed, prior to which India received IAEA and NSG waivers, ending restrictions on nuclear technology commerce with which India became de facto sixth nuclear power in world.
India's GDP is US$1.237 trillion, which makes it the twelfth-largest economy in the world[112] or fourth largest by purchasing power adjusted exchange rates. India's nominal per capita income US$1,068 is ranked 128th in the world. In the late 2000s, India's economic growth has averaged 7½% a year, which will double the average income in a decade.[105]
Despite India's impressive economic growth over recent decades, it still contains the largest concentration of poor people in the world, and has a higher rate of malnutrition among children under the age of three (46% in year 2007) than any other country in the world.[113][114] The percentage of people living below the World Bank's international poverty line of $1.25 a day (PPP, in nominal terms Rs. 21.6 a day in urban areas and Rs 14.3 in rural areas in 2005) decreased from 60% in 1981 to 42% in 2005.[115] Even though India has avoided famines in recent decades, half of children are underweight, one of the highest rates in the world and nearly double the rate of Sub-Saharan Africa.[116]
A 2007 Goldman Sachs report projected that "from 2007 to 2020, India’s GDP per capita will quadruple," and that the Indian GDP will surpass that of the United States before 2050, but India "will remain a low-income country for several decades, with per capita incomes well below its other BRIC peers."[107] Although the Indian economy has grown steadily over the last two decades; its growth has been uneven when comparing different social groups, economic groups, geographic regions, and rural and urban areas.
February 25th, 2010  
Bolava
 
 
i think India shouldn't have a seat in unsc.if every country that think it is great and has the right to have the seat,we will see 30 permanent seats in unsc.i agree that India is a big country but it is far to match america or china in many domains.i think japan and Germany has the right to attend the council more than India.
February 25th, 2010  
sidewinder
 
 
Well mate japan and Germany are great nation,but India is bigger military power.every body think's there nation is great there is nothing wrong in that.but in Asia we are in top 3.be it economy, defense or technology.we are moving with a great pace.although we do have our share of problems.at the same time India can not only provide more stability in the region but can also work with other nations to make this region more economically stable.we are the biggest democracy in the world,and by leading the region as an example we can make more nations to work with us.this will solve many problems like poverty,basic infrastructure and unemployment.it will not only create new opportunities
for young population but it will propel them to lead a good and healthy life.
--
February 25th, 2010  
Chukpike
 
India might well deserve a seat. The permanent members could use a review. The countries that belong to the European Union might only deserve one European Union seat.
February 25th, 2010  
A Can of Man
 
 
Sounds reasonable.
February 27th, 2010  
LeEnfield
 
 
If a seat on the UNSC is based on the military numbers then why hasn't North korea got a seat on it
February 27th, 2010  
A Can of Man
 
 
Other factors would be economic and political. As well as significance in global affairs.
February 27th, 2010  
midozaher
 
i think china represents asia, maybe the middle east needs a country to represent in the unsc.
February 27th, 2010  
A Can of Man
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by midozaher
i think china represents asia
No.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Unless the UNSC becomes some kind of "power sharing" understanding between major powers. Kind of like when the Pope drew a line for the parts of the world the Spanish could take and the parts the Portuguese could take.
February 27th, 2010  
Chukpike
 
Not likely there will ever be a change in the permanent members on the Security Council. Pretty sure it would take a vote by the Security Council to change. Permanent members have veto power.

Do you think any would vote themselves off?
 


Similar Topics
India Awakens
India builds a 2,500-mile barrier to rival the Great Wall of China
Indians are so treacherous -- Richard Nixon
India and Pakistan
Should new perm members be added to the UN security council?