WarMachine
Active member
So anyone who wants to fight against opression is evil? I don't agree what Basaev has done but the russians have essentially destroyed chechnya, a part of their own country, just to stop a secession.
Nobody said that. What a rhetoric question and observation. We blamed Basaev for being a monster, regardless of what oppression he was fighting against by killing children.WarMachine said:So anyone who wants to fight against opression is evil? I don't agree what Basaev has done but the russians have essentially destroyed chechnya, a part of their own country, just to stop a secession.
WarMachine said:Ok, you cleared that up as far what you meant. But he wouldn't have been so popular if it weren't for the russians who i think were much worse than he ever was in this conflict.
What can i say, Russia is in a tight situation with the reduction of freedoms and all that. But remember, this is a country that since it's formation has been under strict authoritarian rule. The way Putin is acting now is being quite friendly compared to the vast majority of russia's past leaders.
Yeltsin started the chechen war back when Russia was in a wild west market economy and nobody cared. All the sudden they export much more oil and they're under scrutiny? It's all politics and i think from a russian point of view there really isn't a big deal since they are living better lives in the past few years. The chechen conflict is their one black mark that's just bringing their whole image down, but it was handled very poorly when it first started.
Anyway, the fewer commanders that kill civilians the better. I suppose that logic would apply to Bush, but that's another subject and we shouldn't go there here.
WarMachine said:I think it's pretty stupid to create an indpendent chechnya since it would be surrounded by russia anyway. The massacres mentioned were terrorists acts, but a lot of death on the chechen side was a contributing factor to these events occuring. I don't see these things in black and white because that's usually never the case. I like to know about the russian and chechen side and i've realized overtime that both have been very lethal in their methods throughout that conflict. I think the chechens resorted to terrorism because it was easy, but it isn't paying off. Now i don't think that you can ever justify terrorism against civilians since civilians never fight an opponent, the military fights.
WarMachine said:It was an interesting history of it, but it really boils down to what the russians will do in order to stop the conflict. It's spilled over into dagestan in some parts and that sounds more like a widening area of conflict.
I wouldn't too much about the chechen underworld, i heard the russians have an even larger mafia working on a scale that would do Al Capone proud. If it wasn't for the russian goverment's initial problems with calming down checnya, then the chechen captial wouldn't have been destroyed. See, this conflict just reciprocates until the chechen found a new source of fervor in radical islam to justify their continuation of the conflict.
If russia is going to keep doing this whack-a-mole strategy against the region, then they have to wake up and realize that it hasn't been working. I don't know what is necessary since i'm not an expert in regional warfare, but diplomacy with some promise of an official autnomous republic doesn't sound so bad. You just have to make sure that the chechens are run by government officials who aren't gangsters or are under the control of gangsters.