Scalar weapons

[Corocotta]

I have beeb reading an article about this kinda weapon and i think it´s amazing.
What do you know about it? What do you think?

After over 30 years of development, and extensive testing around the globe, these new scalar electromagnetic weapons are up and running and ready to go. Tom Bearden, at his website Cheniere, dicusses the history of these new scalar electromagnetic weapons in his paper "Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons."

Some Immediate Implications:


The implications of successful engineering of the longitudinal waves are enormous, and will change the world as we know it, one way or another. Among other things, these discoveries mean that:

1. The solutions to the energy crisis and the "oil problem" are in hand. These oil wars are unnecessary. There is endless energy available freely from the domain of time.

2. Unbelievably powerful weapons are not only possible, but are already operating in several nations. The many powers of these weapons are unprecedented and mind-boggling.

3. The cure of diseases such as cancer and AIDS, in fact nearly any disease, has become possible within a few years of sufficient funding. Everyone can be made healthy and stay healthy.

4. Mind control on a mass scale has now become possible, and the machines to do it are already in place in certain nations. It has become possible to mentally enslave whole populations with the twist of a few dials.


http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

Tom Bearden is the creator of this articles: http://twm.co.nz/Beard_bio.htm

 

[Kozzy Mozzy]

I hate these goddamn things. Every goddamn conspiracy nut on the web goes crazy over these things.

It's a hoax. Tom Bearden is either trying to make money or an idiot.

 

[WarMachine]

Maybe if it wasn't the solution to everything i'd believe this stuff.

 

[Corocotta]

I know, it sounds really strange. The thing is that a time ago i heard about certain bombs that could produce a earthquake, and looking for info about it in the web i founded this...

Some of the info in the web sound really realistic...
By the way the author of the web is not Baerden, this guy uses his info.

 

[Corocotta]

I hate these goddamn things. Every goddamn conspiracy nut on the web goes crazy over these things.

It's a hoax. Tom Bearden is either trying to make money or an idiot.

I think that is not a conspiracy, it is a fact, if you do a serch in the web you will find tons of info. Haven´t you heard about E-Bombs??

http://www.techcentralstation.com/032503M.html

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1131608,00.asp

http://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb.htm

http://superconductors.org/emp-bomb.htm


May be in the other article there was some strange things like the mind-control stuff, but I do not doubt for a second of the existance of this weapons. They have been used in Irak.

 

[A Can of Man]

If you set a very large nuke off at a fault that was just begging to go nuts at any moment, yes, you might just be able to pull it off.
But the nuke would be detected by the seismic meters so you couldn't get away with it.

I know, it sounds really strange. The thing is that a time ago i heard about certain bombs that could produce a earthquake, and looking for info about it in the web i founded this...

Some of the info in the web sound really realistic...
By the way the author of the web is not Baerden, this guy uses his info.

 

[Kozzy Mozzy]

I hate these goddamn things. Every goddamn conspiracy nut on the web goes crazy over these things.

It's a hoax. Tom Bearden is either trying to make money or an idiot.

I think that is not a conspiracy, it is a fact, if you do a serch in the web you will find tons of info. Haven´t you heard about E-Bombs??

http://www.techcentralstation.com/032503M.html

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1131608,00.asp

http://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb.htm

http://superconductors.org/emp-bomb.htm


May be in the other article there was some strange things like the mind-control stuff, but I do not doubt for a second of the existance of this weapons. They have been used in Irak.

Yes, EMP bombs are real. There was talk of using them in Iraq, but it never happened because it turned out developing them were harder then thought.

These scalar weapons operate on pseudo science. Basically they dont exist;

 

[Knightraptor]

It is far easier to detonate a nuke high in the atmosphere to get an EMP wave.

 

[Corocotta]

These scalar weapons operate on pseudo science. Basically they dont exist

Well, I do not know much about this, but if I understood correctly E-Bombs is just one of the uses of EMP Weapons.

Inside an Air Force research lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico, scientists since the 1980s have been quietly developing one of the nation's most highly guarded military secrets, one of the "black" programs under the jurisdiction of the Directed Energy Directorate. The electromagnetic bomb, or e-bomb, is a new class of weapon based on high-power surges, and it can render impotent even the most advanced digital weapons.

This web page is really interesting:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/ebomb.html


I can imagine what would happen if some crazy terrorist uses one of this e-bombs in a city in europe or usa. We willbe right back to the middle age!

 

[Kozzy Mozzy]

You must understand that EMP bombs are not in any way related to the scalar weapons described by Tom Bearden. EMP bombs simply generate a large electromagnetic field, frying electronics over a large area. They are extremely difficult to make, harder then developing nuclear weapons.

"Scalar weapons" described by Tom Bearden are some sort of device that focuses fake "longitudel EM waves". Most of it is pseudo science, it's fake.

 

[Corocotta]

You must understand that EMP bombs are not in any way related to the scalar weapons described by Tom Bearden. EMP bombs simply generate a large electromagnetic field, frying electronics over a large area. They are extremely difficult to make, harder then developing nuclear weapons.

"Scalar weapons" described by Tom Bearden are some sort of device that focuses fake "longitudel EM waves". Most of it is pseudo science, it's fake.

You say that most of it is fake, so somethings are true? Ummmm
You also say it´s pseudoscience, but Baerden gives many examples of the use of this weapons....I know it sounds to conspiracy theory...but you never know.

http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm

 

[Kozzy Mozzy]

I don't think you get it. EMP bombs have nothing to do with scalar weapons. They just have "electromagnetic" in their names.

Most of these examples are either made up, natural phenomenon, or through something else. The USS Tresher wasn't sunk by scalar weapons. It was sunk because ice had covered it's blow valves. When the sub's steering failed, they couldn't blow their tanks and float to the surface. They sank. Earthquakes are caused by tectonic plates moving, not scalar weapons.

 

[Corocotta]

I don't think you get it. EMP bombs have nothing to do with scalar weapons. They just have "electromagnetic" in their names.

Well, both of them are based on electromagnetics.
You do not have to explain how earthquakes are produced. But I have to tell you that if you explode a nuke very proof in the land it will make a small quake.

 

[Whispering Death]

No, nuclear weapons do not make earthquakes anymore than you walking on the gound makes earthquakes.

 

[Corocotta]

No, nuclear weapons do not make earthquakes anymore than you walking on the gound makes earthquakes.

http://www.coastalpost.com/96/4/5.htm

(From a 30 seconds search in the web)

 

[Corocotta]

This is from USGS National Earthquake Center in Golden Colorado, I hope that you won´t say that is propaganda! :roll:

They say that may be there is a relation betewen nukes & earthquakes:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/faq/nuclear.html


USGS said:

 

[Charge 7]

Sorry, but no they don't. From the article who's link you posted:

The possibility of large Nevada Test Site nuclear explosions triggering damaging earthquakes in California was publicly raised in 1969. As a test of this possibility, rate of earthquake occurrence in northern California (magnitude 3.5 and larger) and the known times of the six largest thermonuclear tests (1965-1969) were plotted and it was obvious that no peaks in the seismicity occur at the times of the explosions. This is in agreement with theoretical calculations that transient strain from underground thermonuclear explosions is not sufficiently large to trigger fault rupture at distances beyond a few tens of kilometers from the shot point.

The Indian and Pakastani test sites are approximately 1000 km from the recent Afghanistan earthquake epicenter. The question that has been asked is whether or not the occurrence of these nuclear tests influenced the occurrence of the large earthquake in Afghanistan. The most direct cause-effect relationship is that the passage of the seismic waves, generated by the thermonuclear explosion, through the epicentral region in Afghanistan somehow triggered the earthquake. For example, following the occurrence of the magnitude 7.3 Landers earthquake in southern California on June 28, 1992, the rate of seismicity in several seismically active regions in the western US, as far as 1250 km from the epicenter, abruptly increased coincident with the passage of the earthquake generated seismic wavefield through each site. The abrupt increases in seismicity occurred primarily in regions of geothermal activity and recent volcanism. The mechanism by which this occurred remains unknown. The Afghanistan earthquake occurred at 06:22:28 UT on May 30, 1998 and the thermonuclear test most closely associated in time occurred at 06:55 UT or after the occurrence of the earthquake. The other nuclear tests occurred 2-20 days before the earthquake.

The elastic strains induced in the epicentral region by the passage of the seismic wavefield generated by the largest of the nuclear tests, the May 11 Indian test with an estimated yield of 40 kilotons, is about 100 times smaller than the strains induced by the Earth's semi-diurnal (12 hour) tides that are produced by the gravitational fields of the Moon and the Sun. If small nuclear tests could trigger an earthquake at a distance of 1000 km, equivalent-sized earthquakes, which occur globally at a rate of several per day, would also be expected to trigger earthquakes. No such triggering has been observed. Thus there is no evidence of a causal connection between the nuclear testing and the large earthquake in Afghanistan and it is pure coincidence that they occurred near in time and location.

One last point. The largest underground thermonuclear tests conducted by the US were detonated in Amchitka at the western end of the Aleutian Islands and the largest of these was the 5 megaton codename Cannikin test which occurred on November 6, 1971. Cannikin had a body wave magnitude of 6.9 and it did not trigger any earthquakes in the seismically active Aleutian Islands.

 

[Corocotta]

Third line of the second paragraph of your/mine quote:

The most direct cause-effect relationship is that the passage of the seismic waves, generated by the thermonuclear explosion, through the epicentral region in Afghanistan somehow triggered the earthquake

 

[Corocotta]

Surfin´g through the web I founded info about the HIGH FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP). And the info is quite interesting.
I will give the link of the oficial program and a couple of links of what many people think that´s going on there.This is very relationated with the scalar weapons due to the use of electromagnetics waves....

Oficial web page:

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

Non-oficial pages:

http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/


Where is the true info? If there is just a little bit of truth in all this crap I find it quite scary.

 

[Kozzy Mozzy]

That statement is a hypothetical statement. It is saying that the most obvious and probably correct way that a nuke could trigger an earthquake is through the seismic waves generated. It's not what happened.

I think you need to calm down.