![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Quote:
But if you really think heli's should be used for transporting soldiers, no problem, China produces Z-9 etc, and it is cheap, PLA can simply build 1,000 Z-9 it costs less than 1 billion USD. Z-9: ![]() ![]() As for real serious troops transportation, there are the Airbone Troops for. http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/.../transport.asp |
![]() |
|
![]() |
That does suprise me as im sure if there was a large scale conflict there could be a need for large helicopters as it would enable rapid troop deployment and movement as well as urgent supplies that could help in a battle, in large single battles i can see why theyre wouldnt be a need with the AAMs but away from the battlefield and in smaller battles they could be useful!
|
![]() |
|
|
The heavy cargo helicopters are usefull in some cases, but its contribution to the battle is very limited if the battle is a big one.
Mi-26 helicopter is the heaviest helicopter in the world with a payload of about 20 tons, but yet it cannot transport a tank. Mi-26 is simply a means for transporting some reinforcement weapons or soldiers INTO the batterfield, but in the case of PLA attacking on land, PLA does not need this small amount of reinforcement at all, all the work can be done step by step, no need to jump from A to B across a distance say 100 kilometer, and we know that amount of forces supplied by the helicopters is simply TOO limited if not say meaningless. And in very small engagement, there is no need of a heavy Mi-26, a couple of Z-9 can already do the job. Mi-26 may make an army look very strong, but in practice, its role is very limited. Apache or Chinook all look great, but when facing PLA, no use. |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |