It was a rhetorical question. In general, a rifleman does not stand a chance to get into position, aim, and fire at a tank AND make an effective shot before they're killed.Chief Bones said:I never thought I would see a stupid question only stupid answers ... this particular question comes very very very close to being a stupid question.
First off, nothing was said about the type of rifle or tank that was being discussed. Was armor piercing ammunition being used by the rifleman or was a new type of rifle launched rocket being used?
Are we talking about a tank commander who is exposed to rifle fire or are we talking about a battle tank that is completely closed up? The answer to this question can have far reaching consequences ... if the tank commander can be taken out with a rifle, a rifleman can then finish the job by dropping a grenade through the open hatch.
SOOOO - if you are going to have a discussion as to who would win a confrontation between a rifleman (rifle) and a tank ... then you will have to be a little more specific with the ground rules to be applied to the confrontation.
Just maybe this question is not a stupid question ... but ... it will surely qualify as one until a 'stupider' one comes along. lol
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.