Were a good portion of the Nazi's sadistic bastards? Unquestionably.. But you have shown me a circa 1945 propaganda film created to foment hatred towards the Germans. And it was successful. It has been successful for many decades. But it doesn't prove anything. Wait, it proves the Nazi's had sadists like every other army. The mentally ill would have been given injections to kill them. And, the nazi's did that. But, the first film mentions gas chambers and there were no gas chambers in the Reich or the western European territories. Even the traditionalist holocaust scholars admit that now.
You also say you never read any thing about Hoess being tortured. He was tortured by a British sergeant by the mane of Bernard Clarke. In his history Legions of death, author Rupert Butler at the beginning of the book expresses his gratitude to certain institutions and amoung others, to two persons, one of who was Bernard Clarke. The author quotes Clarke. He says Clarke shows no remorse. On the contrary, he exhibits a certain pride in having tortured a Nazi. Rupert Butler also finds nothing to criticize in that. Neither of them seemed to understand the importance of their revelation. They say that Hoess was arrested on 11 march 1946, and it took three days of torture to obtain a coherent statement. Of course it is nothing more than the lunatic confession, signed by their quivering victim.
The allies needed confessions simply because they had no real evidence for their monstrous and sometimes idiotic claims. They had no autopsies which showed prisoners were gassed. They had no documents or even any credible theory as to how crimes of such magnitude could have been committed. And, getting confessions was easy. You asked me to do more research, maybe you should also.
