Officer classification according to Kurt von Hammerstein-Equord

[perseus]

This officer was an ardent critic of Hitler and was implicated in two plots against him. However my fascination is with this controversial quote, originating a special classification scheme for his men

I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent -- their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy -- they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent -- he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief

I agree with the stupid and diligent definition, but clever and lazy being the most qualified for the highest leadership duties? Is this because they are less likely to make rash decisions or overanalyse everything? How should we intepret this in a non-military context, could we apply it to business.

 

[lljadw]

This officer was an ardent critic of Hitler and was implicated in two plots against him. However my fascination is with this controversial quote, originating a special classification scheme for his men



I agree with the stupid and diligent definition, but clever and lazy being the most qualified for the highest leadership duties? Is this because they are less likely to make rash decisions or overanalyse everything? How should we intepret this in a non-military context, could we apply it to business.

Maybe,because Hammerstein was very lazy :he did not work in the autumn,but spent(or wasted:wink: )his time with hunting .