Obliterating Islamic State (ISIS) - Page 8




 
--
Boots
 
November 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuan
JOC is right! There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world right now, out of which the combined forces in total of Islamic State, al Qaeda, Taliban and Boko Haram makes up 0.003% of global Muslim population. Therefore the statement that Islam propagates terror thus it needs to be A-bombed is flawed because if Islam really bred terror, we’d all be dead now.
Noone said that the Islam needed to be A-bombed ;the question is : why is ISIS handled with kid gloves ?

Why are the US using more violence against Assad who is fighting against ISIS than against ISIS ?

If ISIS and the other criminals are only making up only 0.003 % of the global Muslim population,why do ISIS and the others still exist ?

There are 2 obvious reasons which everyone knows, but they are taboo.
November 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOC
For one thing the radical Japanese were already galvanized against the US that is why they fought so hard. The A-bombs scared the Emperor into thinking if we continued to drop more A-bombs the damage would be unacceptable. Some radical Japanese tried to stop him from surrendering.

The Radicals in the ME would love an opportunity for a general Jihad against the US. The droping of an A-bomb would provide just such an opportunity. Much like the attack on Pearl Harbor galvanized the US against the Japanese in WW2, so the dropping of an atomic bomb would do to the present day Muslim world against the US. You forget many Muslim nations are allies or nonaligned they are not all terrorist regimes or organizations.

Also the US has extensive conventional bombing capability. If needed there is nothing we couldn’t wipeout without using convention weapons like bunker busters, etc. Why use an atomic weapon which would have such negative ramifications?
Can you provide a list of the many US muslim allies ?
November 13th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
There is nothing we couln't wipeout without using convention weapons as bunker busters ?

Oh yes? Why is ISIS than not wipedout? Why was the NVA not wipedout ?

The US is only dropping small amounts of ordinance on ISIS. This is nothing like the full scale attack that brought Saddam to his knees in the 1st Gulf war. The US has chosen to only participate in a small way under the Obama administration in the air war against ISIS.

The NV were brought to their knees by the B-52's in the early 1970's in a way that was never accomplished during nearly a decade of ground war. They were practically ready to surrender. Nixon called off the attacks, politics. I'm not saying the attacks on Hanoi and other NV cities was justified however it brought results, with high civilian cost.
--
Boots
November 13th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Can you provide a list of the many US muslim allies ?
For starters those who are participating in the air campaign: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Bahrain and Jordan
November 14th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Now one sees the results of the pampering policy : 150 people murdered in Paris : there is only one answer possible : REVENGE
November 14th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOC
For starters those who are participating in the air campaign: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Bahrain and Jordan
Are SA,the UAE,Qatar and Bahrein not supporting ISIS ?


Whatever: The US (the West) have no longer any allies in the ME (Egypt is a possible exception :given the insults of Obama to the present regime of Egypt,the influence of the US in Egypt is over)
November 14th, 2015  
I3BrigPvSk
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Now one sees the results of the pampering policy : 150 people murdered in Paris : there is only one answer possible : REVENGE
Are you going to Syria?
November 14th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Now one sees the results of the pampering policy : 150 people murdered in Paris : there is only one answer possible : REVENGE
Numerous Americans are independently fighting ISIS. Like 13 suggested why not join their ranks? You can personally but yourself in a position to dole out revenge against ISIS.
November 14th, 2015  
MontyB
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Now one sees the results of the pampering policy : 150 people murdered in Paris : there is only one answer possible : REVENGE
Clearly you are right on this issue so once we are done nuking all Muslims based on the actions of less than 0.003% of them how long do you suggest we wait before nuking Ireland in order to get rid of the last vestiges of the IRA although they were predominantly Catholic so there goes France, Italy, Spain, Philippines, much of South America and I have just been informed 57% (well above the 0.003% threshold) of Belgium so clearly Belgians are terrorists.

We may need more nukes in order to wipe out any place harboring "potential" terrorists but at least we will be equal opportunities haters and not racist bigots.

Oh yeah and we will also be extinct but safe.
November 15th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Strawman : I did not advocate to nuke the 1.5 billion Muslims
 


Similar Topics
Syrian Kurds battle Islamic State in northeast
U.S. fears Islamic State is making serious inroads in Libya
Islamic State says it's holding 'Israeli spy' in Syria
Iranian Phantom jet strikes the Islamic State in Iraq - IHS Jane's 360
Islamic State says executes second Lebanese soldier