![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Topic: Obama Compares Va. Tech Tragedy to Verbal Violence of Imus...
Obama on Virginia Tech, and "Violence"
A friend points me to the audio of his remarks last night, a 23-minute .mp3 file you can listen to here. It's worth a listen, and it captures what moves a lot of people about Obama. His instinct for abstraction and large themes, and his sense that America's problems have at their root solutions that have as much to do with hope and process as with any specific course of action. Other politicians would -- and will -- stay with the concrete. They'll talk about this tragedy, and, soon, gun control. But while Obama mourns the slain students, he takes the massacre more as a theme than as a point of discussion. "Maybe nothing could have been done to prevent it," he says toward the end. So he moves quickly to the abstract: Violence, and the general place of violence in American life. "There's also another kind of violence that we're going to have to think about. It's not necessarily the physical violence, but the violence that we perpetrate on each other in other ways," he said, and goes on to catalogue other forms of "violence." There's the "verbal violence" of Imus. There's "the violence of men and women who have worked all their lives and suddenly have the rug pulled out from under them because their job is moved to another country." There's "the violence of children whose voices are not heard in communities that are ignored," And so, Obama says, "there's a lot of different forms of violence in our society, and so much of it is rooted in our incapacity to recognize ourselves in each other." Many politicians would avoid, I think, about suggesting that outsourcing and mass-murder belong in the same category. From there, he mourns again the Virginia dead, and then says, "This is an opportunity I think that all of us have today to reflect," and then heads into his stump speech -- education, healthcare, energy policy, politics being broken -- but returning to the Virginia Tech shootings. Anyway, give it a listen. What do you think? |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
In 1954 Religious Fanatics in the United States of America had the words "under god" put into the Pledge to the United States Flag, and then in 1956 "E Pluribus Unum" was superseded by "In God We Trust" as the National Motto.... so, in America there seems to be the US Government advocating that one trust a god to make everything alright in America, if one has a god at all that is. |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
My two cents:
We need to stop thinking of ourselves as hyphenated Americans, i.e. Irish-Americans, African-Americans, Italian-Americans, German-Americans, and so on. We only perpetrate differences that in some cases offend other people. Yes, it is great to respect other heritages, but we, as Americans, have own own history and heritage. |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
This all sounds nice but it will take a long time, the world is full of jackasses and never will everyone see exactly the same way... People just need to lighten up and let each other be, not try to change them but just let them be... |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
Very good choice of words, tomtom! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
I think the Founding Fathers included God in a lot of their letters and speeches before and after the constitutional convention than many modern thinkers would like to admit. Their private and public thoughts on the subject are free for anyone to read in the Federalist Papers. But, no one is obligated to believe in any religion or God to be an American.
Benjamin Franklin- 1787 - Motion for Prayers in the Constitutional Convention And have we now forgotten that powerful Friend? or do we imagine we no longer need its assistance? I have lived, Sir, a long time; and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this Truth, that God governs in the Affairs of Men. And if a Sparrow cannot fall to the Ground without his Notice, is it probable that an Empire can rise without his Aid? Reference: Franklin Collected Works, Lemay, ed., 1138. Thomas Jefferson- 1781 - Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 18 And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever. Reference: Our Sacred Honor, Bennett (352) John Adams- 1776 - Thoughts on Government It is the duty of all men in society, publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the SUPREME BEING, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained, in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping GOD in the manner most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; or for his religious profession or sentiments; provided he doth not disturb the public peace, or obstruct others in their religious worship. Reference: The Works of John Adams, Charles Adams, ed., 221. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
This thought is applicable to most nations, but we can all see that it is not so. One thing that never seizes to amaze me is the will to be different. Sometimes this is harmless and sometimes it is not. It takes a very strong communal experience to make a large group feel as one, but this feeling is often quickly lost when the "problem" solves....
This thought is, like many other great thoughts, great in theorie, lousy in practice. |
![]() |