No Double Jeopardy Deemed For Watada

No Double Jeopardy Deemed For Watada
July 9th, 2007  
Team Infidel

Topic: No Double Jeopardy Deemed For Watada

No Double Jeopardy Deemed For Watada
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
July 8, 2007 The officer's father says the ruling was 'fully expected'
By Helen Altonn
The judge who declared a mistrial in the court-martial of 1st Lt. Ehren Watada has ruled that retrying him won't violate his constitutional right not to be prosecuted again for a crime of which he has been acquitted.
Watada, 29, refused to be deployed to Iraq with his unit last year.
Watada's lawyers filed notice they will appeal the double jeopardy ruling to the Army Court of Criminal appeals in Arlington, Va.
The developments are likely to delay the start of Watada's second trial, which had been scheduled to begin July 23.
Watada, who is based at Fort Lewis in Washington state, continues to perform administrative duties.
Honolulu attorney Eric Seitz, who was Watada's defense lawyer until March, said yesterday he wasn't surprised at Lt. Col. John Head's ruling at a pretrial hearing Friday.
"I would expect they (the appeals court) would take the issues far more seriously than Judge Head is capable of doing. I would never expect Judge Head to reverse himself but would certainly expect the Appellate Court to do that," Seitz said. "He was not the most competent judge I've met in my life."
The military judge declared a mistrial when he presided over the first trial in February. Head questioned whether Watada fully understood a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges against him.
Watada said he understood what he signed but wasn't admitting guilt because he believed he had a defense -- that the war was illegal.
Prosecutors argued that the Hawaii-born Army officer abandoned his soldiers and disgraced himself and the service by accusing the Army of war crimes and denouncing the Bush administration as conducting an illegal war based on lies.
If convicted, he could be sentenced to prison for six years and be dishonorably discharged.
Seitz said after Head declared a mistrial that a second trial would amount to double jeopardy.
Watada hired Kenneth Kagan and James Lobsenz as his new lawyers in March, saying he wanted local representation for his appeal.
Kagan argued Friday that Head should step away from the case because the judge has created the impression that his mind is made up on some issues.
Head denied he has any preconceived notions and refused to disqualify himself from the case. He is expected to give a written decision early this week.
The judge is also expected to rule on the admissibility of evidence, including whether Watada may call witnesses to testify about he legality of the war.
"My own assessment is that it (the military court proceeding) was very much like a Salem witch trial," Ehren's father, Robert Watada, told the Star-Bulletin yesterday by telephone . "We fully expected this."
He said the judge denied most of the defense team's motions. "He hasn't ruled on some motions, but we expect him to deny all motions," including free speech motions, Watada said. "Basically, the judge said the military has a different set of standards under the law."
A new court-martial date hasn't been set but probably will be in October, Watada said.
Robert Watada said he and his wife, Carolyn Ho, sold their Honolulu home and moved to a farm in Pleasant Hill, Ore., about two months ago.
The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Similar Topics
Senate Calls on Canadian Govt to Double Military budget