 |
    |
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
|
|
I've heard they got themselves a new one, the F-16G "Gouldfench."
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
|
|
|
Let's behave now, and continue with the trivia..
|
 --
|
|
|
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
|
|
Topic: Lol
Yeah, yeah, laugh all you want...how about you actually play in the quiz insted of messing with me admin?
NEW POSTED.... http://www.geocities.com/trackedmons...?1077823305008 |
|
February 26th, 2004
|
||
|
|
Topic: Re: LolQuote:
Roger  It looks like it could be Mr. Thompson, M1A1..
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
|
|
|
Topic: Correct.
Yes. very good.
|
|
February 26th, 2004
|
||
|
|
Topic: Re: Correct.Quote:
|
|
February 28th, 2004
|
|
|
|
Topic: OK
NEW ONE POSTED....
http://www.geocities.com/trackedmons...?1078008075697 GhostWolf should have a shot(big hint....) |
|
February 28th, 2004
|
|
|
|
Many many
That piece of Swedish hardware should belong under the "worst military vehicle" topic... Stridsvagn 103, or the S-Tank, is an obsolete Swedish tank, replaced by the Leopard in 1990s. Fast and hard to hit, but..... No turret!!  Had to be stationary to fire. And the entire tank had to be moved to aim sideways, and a hydraulics system was used for elevation... One of the funny features it had was that the radio operator, seated facing rearward in the hull, had duplicate driving controls so that he could act as driver when the tank was in reverse. Great for gettaways..
|
|
February 29th, 2004
|
|
|
|
Well Redleg, the Swedes would mainly use it for one thing only, ambush. Add that with an lengthened L7 gun(Calibre 62 iirc) and an 50 round autoloader with that ment an ROF of 1 RPM, then add the anti-HEAT bars up front, you have a very though target to take on for the Russians trying to push through northern Sweden.
So as long as its used for the role it was ment to, i would hardly put it in the worst military vehicles category. |
 |
