N. Korea and WWIII

Yea that makes sense. Wait until NK nukes us then we fight back. It's not just about us either. They can reach Japan and South Korea. Anyone who threatens freedom needs to be stopped, not just American freedom but freedom abroad as well. If we don't stop them, no one will.
 
Well, its late. I'm fighting a brick wall American. I just thought i would try from a sympathetic perspective. Guess I have to go with blind hatred of anyone other than freedom...My way or the highway and all that.


Who ever heard of changing anothers opinions on the internet anyway?

Night.
 
I have no sympathy for anyone who threatens freedom. A blind hatred of anyone other than freedom? What's that supposed to mean? The man is a dictator who oppresses his people and puts all spending into the military instead of to the people. What am I supposed to do? Like the guy?
 
If i have to deicde between one of our cities being vaporized or one of theirs, its not a hard choice.
 
Rabs said:
If i have to deicde between one of our cities being vaporized or one of theirs, its not a hard choice.
Click to expand...

Well we got a glimpse of what their cities looks like from the pics posted a few threads down, and it looks pretty blank in terms of people as opposed to crowded American cities...
 
Look, there are a couple of cities in the USA that I could live iwth out. (LA, NYC, and WASH. DC)

Oh crap am I thinking out loud again

Anyways back to subject. NK is a threat to the USA and SK and Japan. You are talking about a nation that is trying to build nuclear weapons, ICBMs, and wants to take over SK. Stop the fire before it goes out of control.

Once again, my prediction came true. Red China and Russia does not want to punish North Korea. They just want to give them a slap on the wrist. And once again, the UN is just going to sit around and do nothing.

I just hope my friens in the 2nd Infantry Divsion stay safe.
 
The Cooler King said:
Let's not make it worse? It can't get any worse. We have two allies in this world. The UK and Austrailia. And I'm sure they wouldn't mind if we bombed NK.
Click to expand...
Yeah, right. There is no and never has been a NATO. And there are clearly no german soldiers risking their lives in either Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Active Endeavour or as part of ISAf in Afghanistan.
 
C/1Lt Henderson said:
I'm sure, but everyone is acting like the missiles that flew into the Sea of Japan are some big 'provocation' as FOX News put it. They weren't. I think they were trying to put a damper on the shuttle launch. In which case, they failed miserably. Let me know when the problem is fixed so I can still not be worried. Because the ICMBs are the only ones we should be scared of anyway as they are the only missiles they have that can reach the United States without a closer base(like Cuba).
Click to expand...

Cuba would not take or deploy North Korean missiles. They're hardly allies as it is. Cuba's goal isn't to threaten the USA with nuclear missiles, it's to gain access to the world market (which is essential to any country, socialist or not).

China and Russia don't want to do anything because the missiles aren't aimed at them.
 
Last edited:
We had elections, remember? The new chancellor likes you, she just can't show because of her coalition partner.

Btw, I think it might be not that easy to take out their "missile facilities". Its not like with their nuclear weapons program. For that (nuclear weapons) you need big constructions, a lot of security measures and so forth. Maybe the NKs build theire rockets in one place too, but I know the parts of the Ariane rocket are built by contractors all over europe and are assembled at the launch site. And I don't think blowing things up will put them back 50 years. As long as they have the plans, they can build new ones anytime they want. The Iranians use modified NK rockets too, don't they?
 
NK,s will to nuclear weapon is quite solid.
They began to develop nuclear weapon in 60,s and had world one of the biggest hydroelectric generating station.
Scientists of NK educated in Soviet are highly capable.
I have 100% certainty that Whatever happens on the earth,
NK never stop will to nuclear weapon.
 
0385513194.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


Yup, the UN is going to solve all of this.
 
Jeez you guys really have issues with an organisation that wont rubberstamp everything the US wants.

Heres a question for you:
How much does the USA care about anything that isnt in its own best interests?

Heres a clue its about the same amount as the the rest of the world. aka The "evil" UN.

So please spare us the "UN is the root of all evil" clap trap as the USA is no more a paragon of virtue than any of the other individual nations that make up the UN you are in it for what you can get just like every one else.
 
5.56X45mm said:
FOXNEWS is already asking could this acts by the N. Koreans start WWIII.

The United Nations is not going to sovle any issues. This is going to start another shooting war with the communist north. What will the Red China do in regards to their little radical neighbor. Will they actually try and stop them or will they just sweep this issue under the rug. Also, Russia. What is her stance on this. She is no longer viewing the Asian Continent as her enemy. She just finished a large multinational training exercise with Red China.

The battle lines are being drawn.

All I can say is this. Praise the lord and pass the ammunition.

Also, most of these problems started because of the Clinton Administration. He allowed the N. Koreans to do what ever they wanted. Just like what he did with terrorism.
Click to expand...


The US needs to attack now. Lets send in the Marines.
 
MontyB said:
Jeez you guys really have issues with an organisation that wont rubberstamp everything the US wants.

Heres a question for you:
How much does the USA care about anything that isnt in its own best interests?

Heres a clue its about the same amount as the the rest of the world. aka The "evil" UN.

So please spare us the "UN is the root of all evil" clap trap as the USA is no more a paragon of virtue than any of the other individual nations that make up the UN you are in it for what you can get just like every one else.
Click to expand...
Well, how about the fact that any time there is a major natural disaster, the US is one of the first on the scene? No one said the UN was the root of all evil, that happens to be women(kidding ladies). We did say that the UN doesn't solve anything. "Look inside yourself, you know it to be true."-Eragon. We've not given you any of the clap trap you speak of. We've given you the truth. The United States has uncountable cases of aid to different countries. So back off my country.
 
C/1Lt Henderson said:
The United States has uncountable cases of aid to different countries. So back off my country.
Click to expand...

So does a sizable chunk of the world and I will "back off" your country when its inhabitants start to show the rest of the world the same level of respect they seem to believe the world should be showing it.
 
Another biased 'non-person' .....

MontyB said:
So does a sizable chunk of the world and I will "back off" your country when its inhabitants start to show the rest of the world the same level of respect they seem to believe the world should be showing it.
Click to expand...

MB
Noticed that you chose NOT to place any personal info in your profile ... are you afraid that someone will attack your country as you have been attacking the United States???

Pointing out shortcomings in a discussion format is part and parcel of the debate of issues ... aggressive attacks against ANY country IS NOT good form.

How about pointing out where you think that the US has advocated any issue that was NOT geared towards trying to resolve an issue that the UN has NOT /can NOT /will NOT address. I would like to know exactly why it is bad for a country to carry out policies that are in their best interests.

As far as the UN, the UN has proven again and again and again to be a 'paper tiger' that has no claws or teeth with which to impose their will.

I don't like the idea that the US has become the world's police force and is expected to stamp out all the little brush fires that have popped up around the world.

One of the points was made ... but ... let's put into a better perspective. For every dollar that the rest of the world has given in aid to countries that have been hit by an emergency, the US has given 100 dollars. For every individual that has volunteered to go into these disaster areas, 10 Americans have answered the call.

What does the United States get in return ... countries that for one reason or another have NEVER paid back ANY monies that were loaned for a variety of reason ... when the US decided to unilaterally enforce a mandate that was voted on in the UN, major UN countries ran with their tails between their legs ... when the US requests that the UN and countries surrounding North Korea address N. Korea's nuclear program, some of these players are no where to be seen.

To top all of this off, there are people from around the world who have unrealistic expectations of exactly what action should be taken to address world issues but have no suggestions to offer ... only condemnation of the US when we attempt to address them.

You appear to be one of these people ... how about giving the rest of the forum members some idea of what your background is (either that ...or) keep your country knocking comments to yourself. As an American I resent it when someone slams the United States but tries to hide what their bias is ... that is exactly what you are doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top