bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
The proof is that they have filed bankruptcy or that they are currently receiving welfare. As for logic, you are the one who laid claim to having formed some form of logical thesis but in fact did not. There is no tree of knowledge, its called logic, read Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Descartes and Bacon and you will learn how to form an argument which flows from logic and provides proof of your claims rather than following the path of modern advertising and appealing to emotion rather than intellect.
Again, corporations do not vote so it matters not that they receive welfare as this is about voting not about welfare nor about corporate influence. Stick to the argument at hand.
Also you need to undertake a study of the constitutional limitations of the Supreme Court to understand that they overstepped their bounds when they legislated through their decision rather than sticking to their mandate to simply interpret the laws passed by congress. That's the supreme law of OUR land.
Humans are not equal. Look around you. Its an emotional and specious appeal. Sure it would be wonderful if we were but were NOT. We are not equal in looks, intellect or any other measurable quantity. Its a utopian dream and not surprising to hear espoused by one steeped in a culture of socialism.
You still are commiting ad hominem attacks and unable to mount a logical defense in your mea culpa about not understanding Mr Kennedy's points. FYI he is one of the most learned men on the subject of US Consitutional law. A qualified expert if you will... your failure to understand DOES NOT translate into an invalidation of his argument which is in fact based on logic with proof and not based on fallacies.
Again, corporations do not vote so it matters not that they receive welfare as this is about voting not about welfare nor about corporate influence. Stick to the argument at hand.
Also you need to undertake a study of the constitutional limitations of the Supreme Court to understand that they overstepped their bounds when they legislated through their decision rather than sticking to their mandate to simply interpret the laws passed by congress. That's the supreme law of OUR land.
Humans are not equal. Look around you. Its an emotional and specious appeal. Sure it would be wonderful if we were but were NOT. We are not equal in looks, intellect or any other measurable quantity. Its a utopian dream and not surprising to hear espoused by one steeped in a culture of socialism.
You still are commiting ad hominem attacks and unable to mount a logical defense in your mea culpa about not understanding Mr Kennedy's points. FYI he is one of the most learned men on the subject of US Consitutional law. A qualified expert if you will... your failure to understand DOES NOT translate into an invalidation of his argument which is in fact based on logic with proof and not based on fallacies.
Last edited: