behemoth79
Active member
Why is it that the media expects all military action to be done with no "non-combatant casualties" and then flames the government for spending all that money on developing smart bombs and other means of combat that are intended to reduce the casualties? isnt the media asking for too much. they're saying, "we dont want you to kill civilians but dont spend any money to figure out how. just do it." its impossible. the media must concede on one end or the other. either let civs die or let the govt spend.
what do you guys think about this situation? is the media just pointing fingers without any proposed solutions? and what can be done to resolve this situation?
what do you guys think about this situation? is the media just pointing fingers without any proposed solutions? and what can be done to resolve this situation?