Leo 2/Abrams vs. Challenger 2 - Page 3




View Poll Results :Leopard 2/Abrams vs. Challenger 2
Leopard 2/Abrams 16 76.19%
Challenger 2 5 23.81%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

 
--
 
January 20th, 2006  
Damien435
 
 
OK, here, US tank crew in an Abrams/Leopard 2 against a US tank crew in a Challenger 2, who survives? Who fries?
January 20th, 2006  
AlexKall
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insight
Because that would make the thread even more inane than it already is. The whole discussion is based in school boy fantasy and the overly romantic notions of military equipment propogated through cheap novels and movies. It misses the essence of what turn a bunch of thugs with heavy equipment into a fighting force.
School boy fantasy? If you don't like the thread then dont read it nor reply to it. I bet you're just posting to make a stir in this thread, really mature!
January 21st, 2006  
Mohmar Deathstrike
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by major liability
T-90? I thought it was a failure next to its western counterparts? The only Russian tanks I'd consider for the top slot are the T-80UM2 Black Eagle and T-95, but there's not enough data available on either to issue a proper judgement.

Oh well. If it's going to be a tie, why not include the Challenger 2? Most advanced armor ever.
No, I was talking about the Japanese-made Type 90.
--
January 21st, 2006  
Kozzy Mozzy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien435
OK, here, US tank crew in an Abrams/Leopard 2 against a US tank crew in a Challenger 2, who survives? Who fries?
Which ever gets the shot off first. The crew in the M1A2 may be able to do this faster with the x50 FLIR.

You must remember that tanks don't fight alone, they always fight in at least platoons
January 21st, 2006  
Doug97
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koz
Which ever gets the shot off first. The crew in the M1A2 may be able to do this faster with the x50 FLIR.
What's the maximum zoom on the Challenger IIE's thermal imagers?
January 21st, 2006  
Damien435
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koz
Which ever gets the shot off first. The crew in the M1A2 may be able to do this faster with the x50 FLIR.

You must remember that tanks don't fight alone, they always fight in at least platoons
Or they try to.
January 22nd, 2006  
Kozzy Mozzy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug97
What's the maximum zoom on the Challenger IIE's thermal imagers?
The TOGS II on the Challenger 2 can optical zoom x4 and x11.5. The M1A2SEP can x3 and x10 optical zoom but with the x50 digital zoom. The digital zoom gives a much higher resolution, making IDing targets faster.
January 23rd, 2006  
zander_0633
 
 
Any idea How far can both tanks shoot?
January 23rd, 2006  
Damien435
 
 
No one really knows, during Desert Storm some Abrams recorded kills from distances that were supposed to be twice that of their true kill range.
January 23rd, 2006  
Insight
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
School boy fantasy? If you don't like the thread then dont read it nor reply to it. I bet you're just posting to make a stir in this thread, really mature!
Not at all. I'm bothered by the notion that military operations can be simplified down to some objective calculus of relative technological advantage. It diminishes what we do. Wars are fought by professionals for a reason. If it was merely a matter of "the best widget wins", then it would be a relatively simple endevour that is very easy to predict.

In light of the young minds that frequent this board, I see a small obligation to inject some reality into a very serious business. I do think that is mature, and I'm not being sarcastic which would be in violation of the forum rules, IIRC. (not that it's my place to say either way, just making an observation).