Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty

5.56X45mm

Milforum Mac Daddy
Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty

Obama's $1 trillion deficit-spending 'stimulus plan' seen as last straw

Posted: February 06, 2009
11:50 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

020609brogdon.jpg

Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon

NEW YORK – As the Obama administration attempts to push through Congress a nearly $1 trillion deficit spending plan that is weighted heavily toward advancing typically Democratic-supported social welfare programs, a rebellion against the growing dominance of federal control is beginning to spread at the state level.

So far, eight states have introduced resolutions declaring state sovereignty under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, including Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

Analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania.

"What we are trying to do is to get the U.S. Congress out of the state's business," Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon told WND.

"Congress is completely out of line spending trillions of dollars over the last 10 years putting the nation into a debt crisis like we've never seen before," Brogdon said, arguing that the Obama stimulus plan is the last straw taxing state patience in the brewing sovereignty dispute.

"This particular 111th Congress is the biggest bunch of over-reachers and underachievers we've ever had in Congress," he said.

"A sixth-grader should realize you can't borrow money to pay off your debt, and that is the Obama administration's answer for a stimulus package," he added.

The Ninth Amendment reads, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The Tenth Amendment specifically provides, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Brogdon, the lead sponsor of the Oklahoma state senate version of the sovereignty bill, has been a strong opponent of extending the plan to build a four-football-fields-wide Trans-Texas Corridor parallel to Interstate-35 to Oklahoma, as WND reported.

Rollback federal authority

The various sovereignty measures moving through state legislatures are designed to reassert state authority through a rollback of federal authority under the powers enumerated in the Constitution, with the states assuming the governance of the non-enumerated powers, as required by the Tenth Amendment.

The state sovereignty measures, aimed largely at the perceived fiscal irresponsibility of Congress in the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have gained momentum with the $1 trillion deficit-spending economic stimulus package the Obama administration is currently pushing through Congress.

Particularly disturbing to many state legislators are the increasing number of "unfunded mandates" that have proliferated in social welfare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, in which bills passed by Congress dictate policy to the states without providing funding.

In addition, the various state resolutions include discussion of a wide range of policy areas, including the regulation of firearms sales (Montana) and the demand to issue drivers licenses with technology to embed personal information under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative and the Real ID Act (Michigan).

Hawaii's measure calls for a new state constitutional convention to return self-governance, a complaint that traces back to the days it was a U.S. territory, prior to achieving statehood in 1959.

"We are trying to send a message to the federal government that the states are trying to reclaim their sovereignty," Republican Rep. Matt Shea, the lead sponsor of Washington's sovereignty resolution told WND.

"State sovereignty has been eroded in so many areas, it's hard to know where to start," he said. "There are a ton of federal mandates imposed on states, for instance, on education spending and welfare spending."

Shea said the Obama administration's economic stimulus package moving through Congress is a "perfect example."

"In the state of Washington, we have increased state spending 33 percent in the last three years and hired 6,000 new state employees, often using federal mandates as an excuse to grow state government," he said. "We need to return government back down to the people, to keep government as close to the local people as possible."

Shea is a private attorney who serves with the Alliance Defense Fund, a nationwide network of about 1,000 attorneys who work pro-bono. As a counter to the ACLU, the alliance seeks to protect and defend religious liberty, the sanctity of life and traditional family values.

Republican state Rep. Judy Burges, the primary sponsor of the sovereignty resolution in the Arizona House, told WND the federal government "has been trouncing on our constitutional rights."

"The real turning point for me was the Real ID act, which involved both a violation of the Fourth Amendments rights against the illegal searches and seizures and the Tenth Amendment," she said.

Burges told WND she is concerned that the overreaching of federal powers could lead to new legislation aimed at confiscating weapons from citizens or encoding ammunition.

"The Real ID Act was so broadly written that we are afraid that it involves the potential for "mission-creep," that could easily involve confiscation of firearms and violations of the Second Amendment," she said.

Burges said she has been surprised at the number of e-mails she has received in support of the sovereignty measure.

"We are a sovereign state in Arizona, not a branch of the federal government, and we need to be treated as such, she insisted.
 
So have you considered the Libertarian Party 5.65 x 45mm?

Do you have any basic understanding of economics old boy? Have you studied any of the causes of the Great Depression?
 
I think the whole point is, they're already out of money, and the federal government is telling them to spend more.

But I'm already a libertarian so I'm biased. :D
 
I dont' understand why they wish to do this. 8 years of war wasn't enough to cause them to want more freedom but when the economy's in the tank and someone has a solution that might sting a little THEN OH MY GOD PEOPLE GOT TO BE FREE.
 
Money has a lot to do with things..... the American Revolution basically started because of money. Same with the Civil War.....

It sounds cheap and degrading but it's the truth.... mess with people's pocket books and people get angry.

But also there has been some rumblings for a while from the past two administrations about the Fed .Gov overstepping their authority.
 
I'm laughing on the outside and crying on the inside.

This stimulus is meant to encourage people to spend more, so that manufacturers can produce more, suppliers can supply more and so on - isn't that part of the cause of the "credit crunch"?

To my mind the true culprits are the credit rating agencies, which assigned a "value" to assets, companies and even brand names, now people are realising that these values were grossly exaggerated and are voting with their feet, so what started off as a housing bubble has exploded across the world.

The only real solution is that we'll have to suck it up and pay for it - even if we didn't benefit from the boom. Sooner or later inventory will clear from shelves, meaning that retailers will want stock, so they'll order stuff and the whole supply chain will slowly kick into gear.

Jump starting the economy is all well and good, but if you need to keep jump starting your car, don't you think that is is time to get if fixed? Don't get me wrong, if this stimulus gets me a job then I'm happy, but at the end of the day the underlying causes still have to be addressed.

So we've had the party & now it's time for the hangover - hair of the dog anyone?
 
Several states have recently appealed to the 10th and/or the 9th Amendments to assert their state rights over federal government. These amendments state:

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

1. Washington
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2009&bill=4009

2. New Hampshire
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

3. Arizona
http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm

4. Montana
http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm

5. Michigan
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(sj...-2010/Journal/House/htm/2009-HJ-01-22-002.htm

6. Missouri
http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM

7. Oklahoma
http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/200...tor-charles-key-wants-to-limit-federal-power/

8. Hawaii
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/
 
What a bunch of big children!

"Congress is completely out of line spending trillions of dollars over the last 10 years putting the nation into a debt crisis like we've never seen before," Brogdon said
Has Brogdon forgotten who ran the country the last 8 years out of the ten? And weren't Bill's last years made difficult by a Republican dominated congress?

"A sixth-grader should realize you can't borrow money to pay off your debt, and that is the Obama administration's answer for a stimulus package," he added.
How can he shamelessly say this?? Who caused the US to nose-dive into a record debt? And what did the Bush administration do? Borrow money to compagnies, who didn't change one thing.... Bonusses, new multi million dollar interiors ,etc. etc. And now he is trying to lecture Obama while he kept his mouth shut when he could have made a difference!

Burges told WND she is concerned that the overreaching of federal powers could lead to new legislation aimed at confiscating weapons from citizens or encoding ammunition.
Hahahaha The patriot act was a bowl of peaches.... First Republicans don't mind that your phones, emails etc is viewable by all kind of agencies, to protect the country. But encoding ammo is "overreaching" federal powers? If you can say: "If you don't have nothing to hide, why worry?" to the Patriot Act, why can't you say it to encoding ammo?

In my opinion it is so very pathetic that the Republican party is undermining Obama on every step. First all of the Republicans vote against his new program and now this. I thought they loved their country and were willing to help the US on top of things. But it seems they are big children who ruined their country, got voted out of office and continu to say: We want to help the US only when we do it our way! This way was proven wrong. Grow up and work with the majority!
 
Back
Top