Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
Look, I know all the technicals ins and outs. My point is that the landwarrior system is an extremely complex, specialized, and expensive system that solves problems which are not in the top 5 that the infantry is facing. That is something I want you to think about... think about the top 5 problems our infantrymen would like solved TODAY and I highly doubt landwarrior solves any of them.
Once we get next-gen rifels, lighter/better body armor, real APC/IFV capabilities, then it will be time to start talking about landwarrior. Right now it's a project that needs to be put on the back burner in favor of war-winning innovations, not made-for-TV press darlings.
|
I seriously doubt you have any contact with any R&D stuff. Just what do you think is going to be light and thin and is goin to stop a M80 7.62mm Ball round?
So the M113, M2/M3 and Stryker are what exactly?
You can't make a different vehicle for every type of mission and battlefield you must make multi-functional and multi-mission platform's.
You can't have one APC for this and another for this.