For security purposes while in transition we declare martial law and the Joint Chiefs are in charge while the following take place.
Im not sure that a martial takeover of the country, even in a temporary manner is what the founding fathers had in mind for our country. Letting anyone, at anytime have that much power is inadvisable at best.
All elected officials are made to stand election wherein there is no media advertising or coverage allowed. No staffers to coach and no polls. The candidate must stump it in front of the people with only what they know.
As much as negative campaigns and ads are bad for the country, I disagree that there should be NO coverage. The candidates should have a chance to state what they believe, and what they plan to do. If they can not do that, then there can be no educated election. As for staffers, If they want to get the message about their beliefs out to the voters, they will need some sort of staff to get the word out. Also the election manner of senate and house candidates is a state decision and that is clearly stated in Article I Section 4 of the constitution. There should be no government-level oversight of these elections.
All welfare is ended, domestic and international, corporate and private.
My issue with this is that welfare itself is a very general term. Scholarships to help kids go to college is a kind of welfare, to enable kids who grew up in a econimcally poor situation become productive members of society. Welfare to people who were injured on the job and are now unable to work is another kind of welfare, and it helps keep buisnesses accountable for the physical well-being of their workers. To say what you said, you should specify the type of welfare you are talking about.
A complete review of laws is made in strict interpretation of the Constitution from the federal to local level.
Well I personally tend to be more in favor of a loose interpretation of the Constitution, so I will disagree with the above statement.
The right to vote is subject to a litmus test to include but not limited to intelligence and demonstrated responsibility in keeping with the wishes of the founding fathers.
The American way of life is based off of equality, off of the chance of every single member of the country to guide its future, and to help make decisions that will help America. What you would have if you followed this is exactly what we rebelled against: "Taxation without Representation".
EDIT: These are only the things I disagree with from your post.