well those industrial equipment were not chinese, but japanese...

You did fight to the death, but the first time around, you lost anyway.
Pillaging, raping and looting? Well that's just traditional war. That's how things were in the past. Only in very recent history has this act been frowned upon. It happened all the time, everywhere. When you won your fight, it was expected that you had the right to carry home whatever you could carry.

Originally Posted by Chinaman

nah, china would fight to the death for manchuria, even the nationlistics would

anyways, the russins looted manchuria, so theyve got the goods

i dont get it, wuts with german, japanese and russian soldiers with pillage, raping and looting, it will not help with the war

ya..that can justify wut japan has done in korea..they did nothing wrong then, just doing traditional stuff...

The Soviet Union was invading Manchuria at the end of WWII, only days before America dropped the Atomic Bombs. Stalin wanted a warm water port, he wanted Korea, but he would take Manchuria too if he got the chance because of it's industry and agricultural value, which is what he tried to do. He invaded on the basis of removing the Japanese, much like Eastern Europe, but he was forced to stop because of the Japanese Surrender.

There is not justification for what Japan did to China or Korea, but war is a terrible thing and it brings the best and the world out of people, unfortunately it is more often the latter.

ummmmm


iran?

back to the toppic please!

first...tell u again..it was not an invasion, it was a part of agreement between Rooselt and stalin, to eliminate the japanese Guan Dong army in manchuria...althogh soviets did loot away some machines...they give the land back and also weapons to chinese army..


back to topic....

iranians still use human waves tactic right? as they did in 1980s in war with iraq

Originally Posted by Sexybeast

iranians still use human waves tactic right? as they did in 1980s in war with iraq

I don't know, ask the CIA, they have people on the ground in that country, they would know, if I had to take a guess I would say yes because they do not have the technology to use any other style of fighting, and if it is anything like Soviet or Chinese human wave tactics only about 1/2 of the men actually have weapons, but with the lowered prices of weapons and I sure everyman will have an AK-47 variant of some sort and atleast two magazines.

conventional war: no chance

unconventional war: this is what i fear.

they are not dumb enough to charge in front of tanks and helicopters and B-52s....

there will be tons of urban wars...RPG shootings from corner...attack supply lines..suicide bombs shit..

maybe even terriost attack back to U.S