![]() |
![]() |
||
|
English_Xinhua 2009-03-09 17:45:49 Print
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
Pak uses "made in china and painted in pakistan" missiles. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
If Iran get nukes, it will change the balance in the area. It will increase the risk for an arms race. If more nations get these weapons, the risk for somebody to use them increase, perhaps it will also decrease the risk for a major armed conflict in the area. Nuclear weapons are not military weapons, they are political weapons.
|
![]() |
||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
|
Quote:
This is what many of us is trying to get through the skulls of those who believe Iran should or have a right to obtain a nuclear bomb. If one country gets a nuke, then it is likely their rivals to get nukes and so on. A nuclear arms race in the M.E is something the west fears and with great reason, it is the spot where western nations have their economy fixed on. If only we can reduce our usage of oil enough to where we won't have to worry so much. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Don't you guys think this is a double standard by US in dealing with Iran n Pakistan?
Its pakistan who's got nukes and their economy and political system on hooks and their support for Taliban and OBL does not need any proof, the aid given to them is used in acquiring nukes and finiancing terror attack on Indian soil. |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
They prevent wars, but this Security Dilemma is fragile. There is also another factor that can be a reason for a country to get N-weapons, the prestige to have them. Another reason can also be, if a country feels threaten, they want to have N-weapons as well. In the case of Iran, the pressure they feel from the outside world can be contra-productive. If the threat is real or imaginary doesn’t matter so much for them |
![]() |