Iran Says Nuclear Freeze Won't Last Long (Reuters)




 
--
 
November 30th, 2004  
News Manager
 

Topic: Iran Says Nuclear Freeze Won't Last Long (Reuters)


Reuters - Iran reiterated Tuesday it was only
prepared to freeze its uranium enrichment activities for a few
months and would not, as the EU and Washington want,
permanently mothball facilities which could make atomic bombs.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20041130/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc]Read more...[/url]
November 30th, 2004  
DTop
 
 
Does this surprise anyone?
November 30th, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Nope. These ers scare me.
--
December 1st, 2004  
Kane
 
Quote:
Nope. These ers scare me.

No. There is nothing to be scared about the Iranian government. If they meant that nuclear technology will be used for peaceful purposes, then they will have to keep their promises. If not, then it will be regrettable for Iran.
December 1st, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Okay. A goverment run by fundamentalist Islamic Clerics. With a history of supporting Islamic Terror Organizations and voicing extreme anti American and Anti Israeli rhetoric.Now nuclear capable.

Riiiiggghhht nuttin to worry about there high speed.
December 2nd, 2004  
Kane
 
Quote:
Okay. A goverment run by fundamentalist Islamic Clerics. With a history of supporting Islamic Terror Organizations and voicing extreme anti American and Anti Israeli rhetoric.Now nuclear capable.
"Now Nuclear capable"....lol. Not yet. If only if they won't allow inspectors in.

How can the United States solve this situation then heh? Attack Iran?
December 3rd, 2004  
DTop
 
 
Why do you think the U.S. has to solve this problem?
December 6th, 2004  
Kane
 
That is not what I meant to say. This crisis should be in the interest of the communitee, and since the United States is in within the commitee, it should not act alone.
December 7th, 2004  
DTop
 
 
OK Kane now let me review what you've said.
1.
Quote:
How can the United States solve this situation then heh? Attack Iran?
2.
Quote:
This crisis should be in the interest of the communitee, and since the United States is in within the commitee, it should not act alone.
Hmm I can't figure out what you're trying to say. Is it that you think the U.S. shouldn't attack Iran unless it takes some other countries along for the ride? If the U.S. can find some allies then let the attack begin? If not then what is it that you're trying to say? Forgive me but, your statements seem nebulous at best.
December 7th, 2004  
Kane
 
Quote:
Hmm I can't figure out what you're trying to say. Is it that you think the U.S. shouldn't attack Iran unless it takes some other countries along for the ride? If the U.S. can find some allies then let the attack begin? If not then what is it that you're trying to say? Forgive me but, your statements seem nebulous at best.
I'm advocating a more peaceful solution to this situation. I do hope that Iran keeps its promise of using Nuclear Technology based on the Iranian Government's assertion. If there is Iranian Nuclear weapons, then they need to dismantle them. If they refuse, then let the United Nations Security Council decide on that.