Iran To 'Revise' Any Relations With Monitors In Nuclear Area

Iran To 'Revise' Any Relations With Monitors In Nuclear Area
December 28th, 2006  
Team Infidel

Topic: Iran To 'Revise' Any Relations With Monitors In Nuclear Area

Iran To 'Revise' Any Relations With Monitors In Nuclear Area
New York Times
December 28, 2006
Pg. 3

By Nazila Fathi
TEHRAN, Dec. 27 — By an overwhelming vote, Parliament passed a bill on Wednesday that could limit Iran’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations monitor.
The measure was a response to the resolution passed Saturday by the Security Council, which imposed trade sanctions on goods and technology related to Iran’s uranium enrichment and ballistic missile programs.
The Council’s resolution is aimed at curbing those programs, which the United States and Europe contend are intended to make Iran a nuclear weapons state. Iran has repeatedly asserted that its development activities are for nuclear energy, not weapons.
The final draft of the bill in Parliament, approved after two days of debate, asserts that the government should “revise its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency based on the interests of Iran and its people.” The vote was 161 to 15, with 15 abstentions.
It is unclear what “revise its cooperation” means. But the measure was considered by some moderate members of Parliament to be less severe than earlier versions proposed by conservative members, who had wanted Iran to withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and ban all inspectors. The United Nations agency polices adherence to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who denounced the Security Council sanctions as a “superficial action,” is expected to sign the bill.
Although Parliament is dominated by conservatives, there has been a debate among lawmakers about the country’s nuclear policy under President Ahmadinejad, who has asserted that nuclear development is Iran’s inalienable right.
Some minority reformists believe his policy is doing more harm than good by isolating Iran economically.
One reformist lawmaker, Nouredin Pirmoazen, said in a debate on the bill, “The best solution is to establish a bridge with other countries to reduce the tension.”
Others said the bill could give the government a free hand to decide how to continue its relationship with the atomic energy agency. Alaedin Boroujerdi, the head of the foreign policy and national security commission, told journalists that the bill’s vague language meant “the government can do anything based on what it recognizes is for the country’s interests.”
In a gesture that suggested that religious authorities are united behind the bill, the Guardian Council of Islamic clerics immediately approved it, a step that is required for any bill to become law. The Guardian Council has rarely approved a bill so swiftly.
Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, appointed a committee on Wednesday to examine how the country should “revise” its relations with the atomic energy agency. In a news conference later, Mr. Larijani said the Security Council resolution was aimed at “humiliating Iran.” But he also said Iran wanted to continue its nuclear program based on international regulations.

Similar Topics
Iran Looks Like The Winner Of The Iraq War
UPI Interview: Iran and the bomb, Part 1
What If Iran Gets the Bomb? Good Analysis
Rice warns Iran of UN sanctions
Iran's Military