Iran and nukes - Page 3




 
--
 
September 22nd, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Well Iran has effectivly told the International Atomic/nuclear commision to go p*ss up a rope. They will cotinue with their nuclear weapons program. So much for nonproliferation.
My major concern has already been stated by someone else. The Islamic fundamentalist states have the mindset where Israel is concerned to drop the hammer and cook em all in the name of Jihad. If that happens stand by for the sh*t storm that follows.
September 22nd, 2004  
Chocobo_Blitzer
 
Xman has a point, at least, somewhat. He's talking about MAD, if Israel, Iran's enemy, can have a nuke, then Iran needs a nuke to assure MAD. Like the US and USSR. However, the flaw in this is that, unlike Israel, Iran is strongly linked to fundamentalist terrorist who seek no less than the annihilation of Judaism. Israel just wants to protect herself.

Course can't tell most hardcore muslims that, it's all apart of the great Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

Anyways, we're diverting from the topic! How do you stop Iran!?
September 22nd, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
JDAM's a flight of F-117's and and take out their manufacturing facilities before they get one battle ready.
Iran cannot be negoitated with.
--
September 22nd, 2004  
SHERMAN
 
 
Only one issue...Israel is a democracy with no known use of WMDs. Iran is a Theocracy with known use of WMDs....

Edit: and also as to this:
Quote:
Try be honest.How much land does Israel has when it was founded and now how much land does it has?The problem is regarded with that difference.
What are you saying? Are you claiming that Israel is the agressor inn the Middle-East conflict? If you are, and care to discuss it, we can have a new toppic about that....Ill open it right now in military discussions. If you are claiming that Isras nuclear superiority was used to take land from other countrys, you should note that Israel never threatend use of any WMDs, and that all land regarded to as "the territories" was taken in 1967 before Israel is believed to have had had operational nuclear weapons.
September 22nd, 2004  
AsianAmerican
 
 
So will their be military actions from the UN, etc if Iran continues its development of nuclear materials?
September 22nd, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Military Action and UN used in the same sentence creates an Oxymoron. No the UN will pass a resolution condeming Iran's noncompliance and thats about it.
September 22nd, 2004  
FlyingFrog
 
Now I said before, after WW2:
When facing a small nation almost without much military power, then USA calls a bunch of its little allies to show the big chest and fist and beat the he&l out of the small enemy like a big hero of Hollywood film.
When facing a strong enemy like Iran, then you can not find the shadow of the "Uncle" Sam any more

Israel and USA can do nothing against Iran's nuke, there is no Will no Way to attack, so the only realistic way is to take it, facing and embracing the changed/changing world, and build up more TMD, NMD
September 22nd, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Keep bangin the drum on the old Party Line there Frog. There are several things that could be done and may eventually be done time will tell.
September 22nd, 2004  
FlyingFrog
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03USMC
Keep bangin the drum on the old Party Line there Frog. There are several things that could be done and may eventually be done time will tell.
Well, when Pakistan and India got nukes exploded, USA was able to do nothing. People joke USA is the world police, but in reality her power is very limited IMHO.
September 22nd, 2004  
03USMC
 
 
Different situations different circumstances. Iran is not the same.