Chukpike
Banned
Tell me you haven't sat through a Glen Beck patriotic sob-fest where the "Nazi's" haven't made an appearance or a Hannity show where the term "liberal" hasn't been followed by a "want you to be afraid of blah blah blah" line.
Lets not try and and invoke Godwin's law in this argument as it is in this case a valid example.
I agree, it is a valid example. Of Godwin's law.:bravo:
CNN and MSNBC may be just as biased as FOX I wont argue that but the difference is that FOX actively try and direct your opinion through managed story manipulation.
There is only one reason for biased reporting no matter who does it. That is to manipulate the reader.
So now you're admitting that Fox News is no more a "news" organization than Rolling Stone magazine? Okay. Thanks. That clears a lot up. Now that I know Fox News isn't ACTUALLY news, it's okay for them to be biased.
Real news services? Now, that term doesn't include Fox anymore, does it? Because just up there you compared Fox News to Rolling Stone magazine, and Rolling Stone does NOT consider itself a news source.
Please supply some definitive source proving that Rolling Stone does not consider itself a news source.
You really have NO CLUE what constitutes news do you? Out of the mouths of babies:roll:
I know your attention span is exceedingly short. But try and recall what news media had a embedded reporter break the news of General McCrystal's staff comments on the Obama administration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_Stone
http://www.rollingstone.com/
Rolling Stone was reporting news long before you were born.
Please think before you write. You just destroyed any credibility you might have had about news reporting.
How can you judge the amount of bias that FOX NEWS exhibits when you do not know what constitutes news? Or what is a valid news source!
Last edited: