Humanitarian Crisis - Page 6




 
--
Boots
 
September 12th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3BrigPvSk
Can you post the entire interview, please?
Calls for BBC's Tim Willcox to resign over Paris interview ...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Calls...rter-resign-to
September 12th, 2015  
I3BrigPvSk
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Those who are criticizing Israel are attacking all Jews on the world and are driven by the old hatred of the Jews .

Israel fights for its survival,and without the existence of Israel,it is over for every Jew on the world : the survival of the European Jews is more than questionable and,even in the US ,anti-semitism is rising :every day Jews at the UCLA are attacked .

After the terrorist attacks at Paris, the BBC and CNN (both anti-semitic) denied that the attacks were directed against the Jews .

And you know who defends Tim Willcox,Jeremy Bowen and the other Jew haters in and outside the BBC ?

Robert Fisk : the British Streicher,the man who said that we should talk with Isil ,the man who said that the attacks of Paris were the fault of France,because the war of Algeria .

Some one who is defended by Fisk is as much worth as Fisk .
Utter BS, we all can criticize Israel for what they are doing and not being Anti-Semitic. There are Israelis criticizing their own government for what it does, are they also Anti-Semitic?
September 12th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Because : it is not our business : only the Israeli's have the right to criticize their government .

Because :we have the choice : to support Israel or to support Al Quaeda/Isil .

Because : the fall of Israel will result in a world catastrophe : Israel will use its nucleair weapons and the fall-out out will kill millions of Europeans .

Because: if Israel is destroyed,we are the next (the fifth column is already present) .

Because : without Israel,the Jews are doomed .

Reasons enough for not attacking Israel :an attack of Israel is supporting the anti-Western terrorists.


My only point of criticism was that Israel has been to moderate .
--
Boots
September 12th, 2015  
I3BrigPvSk
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Because : it is not our business : only the Israeli's have the right to criticize their government .

Because :we have the choice : to support Israel or to support Al Quaeda/Isil .

Because : the fall of Israel will result in a world catastrophe : Israel will use its nucleair weapons and the fall-out out will kill millions of Europeans .

Because: if Israel is destroyed,we are the next (the fifth column is already present) .

Because : without Israel,the Jews are doomed .

Reasons enough for not attacking Israel :an attack of Israel is supporting the anti-Western terrorists.


My only point of criticism was that Israel has been to moderate .
BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.
September 12th, 2015  
MontyB
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3BrigPvSk
BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.
Agreed, lljadw seems to have swallowed the Zionist story but unfortunately Zionism even to many Jews (you will note that Israel contains less than 50% of the worlds Jewish population) is the Jewish version of ISIS and Al Qaeda just another bunch of fundamentalist fanatics hell bent of racism and domination.
September 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
anti-sionism = anti-semitism,because only in Israel are the Jews safe .
September 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3BrigPvSk
BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.
No : you are faced by two choices : support Israel or support the terrorists.

As Israel is NOT responsible for 9/11 and the other terror actions,the choice is very simple .


Besides:we have not the right to criticize other countries,unless ...their actions are a danger for us .

Is Assad a danger for the West ? NO : thus,we should not criticize him,as was doing the imbecile who is living at the White House .
September 13th, 2015  
I3BrigPvSk
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
No : you are faced by two choices : support Israel or support the terrorists.

As Israel is NOT responsible for 9/11 and the other terror actions,the choice is very simple .


Besides:we have not the right to criticize other countries,unless ...their actions are a danger for us .

Is Assad a danger for the West ? NO : thus,we should not criticize him,as was doing the imbecile who is living at the White House .
No, it's not black and white. We can criticize Israel without supporting terrorists. we can criticize all countries when they behave badly and violating IL. We have the right to do so, who gives you the right to say we can't?

You are criticizing the President of the United States when you call him an imbecile, according to yourself, you can't do that.
September 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Because,what he is doing is a danger for the west : he was one of the responsibles for the elimination of the Khadaffi regime,which resulted in the invasion of Europe by so-called "refugees" ,who are in reality illegal immigrants,of whom an unknown number of terrorists .

And,what he did in Lybia, he is repeating in Syria : it is due to Obama that Isil is advancing and that the Assad regime is wavering .It is also due to Obama that Europe is swarming with illegal immigrants .

And,never 2 without 3 : Obama is repeating in the Ukraine what he did in Lybia and what he is doing in Syria.

And,let's not talk about his Iran policy : to give Iran nuclear capacity is suicidal : it increases the risk of a nuclear war in the ME with fall-out in Europe .
September 13th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by I3BrigPvSk
No, it's not black and white. We can criticize Israel without supporting terrorists. we can criticize all countries when they behave badly and violating IL. We have the right to do so, who gives you the right to say we can't?

.
IL : that's the usual argument of the Liberals : there is NO IL .IL = western norms and we should not impose western norms on the planet,because the non western people will consider this, not unrightfully, as racism,colonialism,imperialism .Why have we the right to say that they behave badly ? They are independent and free in their actions .The Third World is not obliged to give explanations to the West .The West is not the mother-in-law of the world .

The epoch of "Take up the White Man's burden " is over .
 


Similar Topics
With no peace, Ukraine is beset by humanitarian risks: U.N.
About 40 percent of Syrians need humanitarian aid: U.N.
Lack of access in Syria hinders humanitarian aid: EU
Humanitarian crisis deepens in quake-hit Japan (Reuters)
Indians are so treacherous -- Richard Nixon