Humanitarian Crisis

The latest news is that the father of the drowned child (the picture of whom is used to culpabilise European public opinion) is accused

of being a human trafficker

of being the captain of the boat


of being responsible for the death of the passengers by his reckless sailing

Of course,the answer of the liberal media will be a deafening silence
 
I do watch a lot of news. You can call some liberal if you like.
Also the BBC and Aljazeera America, which I find has very well done investigational reporting.
 
BBC reporter Tim Willcox said after the terrorist attacks in Paris in january to a daughter of Holocaust survivers : "Palestinians suffer hugely at Jewish hands as well ".

This was a open anti-semitic statement and glassing over the attacks .

He was not fired .
Why ?

Only explanation : his superiors agreed with him .
 
BBC reporter Tim Willcox said after the terrorist attacks in Paris in january to a daughter of Holocaust survivers : "Palestinians suffer hugely at Jewish hands as well ".

This was a open anti-semitic statement and glassing over the attacks .

He was not fired .
Why ?

Only explanation : his superiors agreed with him .

Can you post the entire interview, please?

To criticize what the Israelis are doing or did, is not being Anti-Semitic, that is to criticize what Israel does occasionally
 
Can you post the entire interview, please?

.....yes do that please... I'll tell you if they're a buncha Nazies...
t1991.gif
 
BBC reporter Tim Willcox said after the terrorist attacks in Paris in january to a daughter of Holocaust survivers : "Palestinians suffer hugely at Jewish hands as well ".

This was a open anti-semitic statement and glassing over the attacks .

He was not fired .
Why ?

Only explanation : his superiors agreed with him .

The only mistake he made was to say "Jewish" and not "Israeli" but that is a fairly easy mistake to make when Israel sells itself as speaking for the Jewish people and in Israeli eyes the two words are the same.

His statement was inaccurate but hardly anti-semetic (and for that matter neither is criticising Israel), and the sooner people learn to separate Jewish and Israeli the better.

Just to prove the point, the wife is Jewish but not Israeli.
 
Can you post the entire interview, please?

To criticize what the Israelis are doing or did, is not being Anti-Semitic, that is to criticize what Israel does occasionally


Those who are criticizing Israel are attacking all Jews on the world and are driven by the old hatred of the Jews .

Israel fights for its survival,and without the existence of Israel,it is over for every Jew on the world : the survival of the European Jews is more than questionable and,even in the US ,anti-semitism is rising :every day Jews at the UCLA are attacked .

After the terrorist attacks at Paris, the BBC and CNN (both anti-semitic) denied that the attacks were directed against the Jews .

And you know who defends Tim Willcox,Jeremy Bowen and the other Jew haters in and outside the BBC ?

Robert Fisk : the British Streicher,the man who said that we should talk with Isil ,the man who said that the attacks of Paris were the fault of France,because the war of Algeria .

Some one who is defended by Fisk is as much worth as Fisk .
 
I should not like to be a Jew in Europe : every Jew in Europe can expect to be attacked every day .

Let's take Britain (but the situation in the other countries is not better):

the Greens and the Liberals are openly anti-Jewish .

the new Labour leader (Jeremy Corbun) is not better :look at his ties with people as Abu Jahjah,Paul Eisen and James Thring .

the Conservative leader is someone without backbone,always prompt to follow the (invented) stories of the anti Jewish media :he only wants to remain PM and as there are millions of Muslims and only a few hundred thousands of Jews ,it is obvious from where the wind is blowing in Downing Street 10 : it is the wind of 1933 in Germany .

And in the US the situation of the Jews is worsening every day,not that this would surprise any one ,considering who is occupying the White House today .
 
Those who are criticizing Israel are attacking all Jews on the world and are driven by the old hatred of the Jews .

Israel fights for its survival,and without the existence of Israel,it is over for every Jew on the world : the survival of the European Jews is more than questionable and,even in the US ,anti-semitism is rising :every day Jews at the UCLA are attacked .

After the terrorist attacks at Paris, the BBC and CNN (both anti-semitic) denied that the attacks were directed against the Jews .

And you know who defends Tim Willcox,Jeremy Bowen and the other Jew haters in and outside the BBC ?

Robert Fisk : the British Streicher,the man who said that we should talk with Isil ,the man who said that the attacks of Paris were the fault of France,because the war of Algeria .

Some one who is defended by Fisk is as much worth as Fisk .

Utter BS, we all can criticize Israel for what they are doing and not being Anti-Semitic. There are Israelis criticizing their own government for what it does, are they also Anti-Semitic?
 
Because : it is not our business : only the Israeli's have the right to criticize their government .

Because :we have the choice : to support Israel or to support Al Quaeda/Isil .

Because : the fall of Israel will result in a world catastrophe : Israel will use its nucleair weapons and the fall-out out will kill millions of Europeans .

Because: if Israel is destroyed,we are the next (the fifth column is already present) .

Because : without Israel,the Jews are doomed .

Reasons enough for not attacking Israel :an attack of Israel is supporting the anti-Western terrorists.


My only point of criticism was that Israel has been to moderate .
 
Because : it is not our business : only the Israeli's have the right to criticize their government .

Because :we have the choice : to support Israel or to support Al Quaeda/Isil .

Because : the fall of Israel will result in a world catastrophe : Israel will use its nucleair weapons and the fall-out out will kill millions of Europeans .

Because: if Israel is destroyed,we are the next (the fifth column is already present) .

Because : without Israel,the Jews are doomed .

Reasons enough for not attacking Israel :an attack of Israel is supporting the anti-Western terrorists.


My only point of criticism was that Israel has been to moderate .

BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.
 
BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.

Agreed, lljadw seems to have swallowed the Zionist story but unfortunately Zionism even to many Jews (you will note that Israel contains less than 50% of the worlds Jewish population) is the Jewish version of ISIS and Al Qaeda just another bunch of fundamentalist fanatics hell bent of racism and domination.
 
BS again, we have the right to criticize Israel and all other countries when and if they behave badly and that doesn't mean we support ISIS, Hamas, or Al Queada.

No : you are faced by two choices : support Israel or support the terrorists.

As Israel is NOT responsible for 9/11 and the other terror actions,the choice is very simple .


Besides:we have not the right to criticize other countries,unless ...their actions are a danger for us .

Is Assad a danger for the West ? NO : thus,we should not criticize him,as was doing the imbecile who is living at the White House .
 
No : you are faced by two choices : support Israel or support the terrorists.

As Israel is NOT responsible for 9/11 and the other terror actions,the choice is very simple .


Besides:we have not the right to criticize other countries,unless ...their actions are a danger for us .

Is Assad a danger for the West ? NO : thus,we should not criticize him,as was doing the imbecile who is living at the White House .

No, it's not black and white. We can criticize Israel without supporting terrorists. we can criticize all countries when they behave badly and violating IL. We have the right to do so, who gives you the right to say we can't?

You are criticizing the President of the United States when you call him an imbecile, according to yourself, you can't do that.
 
Because,what he is doing is a danger for the west : he was one of the responsibles for the elimination of the Khadaffi regime,which resulted in the invasion of Europe by so-called "refugees" ,who are in reality illegal immigrants,of whom an unknown number of terrorists .

And,what he did in Lybia, he is repeating in Syria : it is due to Obama that Isil is advancing and that the Assad regime is wavering .It is also due to Obama that Europe is swarming with illegal immigrants .

And,never 2 without 3 : Obama is repeating in the Ukraine what he did in Lybia and what he is doing in Syria.

And,let's not talk about his Iran policy : to give Iran nuclear capacity is suicidal : it increases the risk of a nuclear war in the ME with fall-out in Europe .
 
No, it's not black and white. We can criticize Israel without supporting terrorists. we can criticize all countries when they behave badly and violating IL. We have the right to do so, who gives you the right to say we can't?

.

IL : that's the usual argument of the Liberals : there is NO IL .IL = western norms and we should not impose western norms on the planet,because the non western people will consider this, not unrightfully, as racism,colonialism,imperialism .Why have we the right to say that they behave badly ? They are independent and free in their actions .The Third World is not obliged to give explanations to the West .The West is not the mother-in-law of the world .

The epoch of "Take up the White Man's burden " is over .
 
Back
Top