![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Divorce rates of Europe
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/peo_div_rat/EUR Divorce rates of North America http://www.nationmaster.com/red/grap...&int=-1&id=NAM Top 4 nations http://www.nationmaster.com/red/grap..._div_rat&int=4 The U.S. has the highest divorce rates of any one country, nonetheless, rates overall in Europe are far exceeding that of the U.S. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
On immigrants and national security:
The main problem with immigrants is loyalty. If they feel more loyal to the country they left than to their new country that can be a huge security problem. However we all know this is not always the case, such as the Ethiopian community in Washington DC is made up of political exiles and the South Vietnamese are in no way fond of the North Vietnamese. On divorce and native population sustainability (for economy, tech. and military etc): As for divorce rates... I think that is a less of an issue than families actually creating children and also the total fertility rate. If they get married, have kids, then divorce then at *least* they still contributed to creating the next generation. Or who knows... maybe the future of having children is in much older age, and they're going to have to preserve the eggs from the mother while she is still in her 20s and have them cryofreezed. Then when she is ready to settle down and have a child with someone, they take it out, artificially inseminate and have the egg put in the womb. If anything, just to have kids. **related to topics we're touching but starting to digress a wee bit from our original topic ** You know what? We might be discovering how the whole gender roles were invented in the first place. Practically every cultural norm, more and even taboo were created at one ponit for a reason. Over time, the reasons are lost and we don't know why we do them but we still do. We're undoing some and we're discovering possibly why the norm was put there in the first place. The existence of men and women both in professional worlds for example. Who knows if we'll discover something about total acceptance of homosexuality? But some we know were created of outdated reasons... such as Muslims not eating pork or touching or eating dogs came from the fact that these animals were often full of disease during the time of Muhamed and that Western attitudes towards dogs comes from Germanic roots where dogs were essential hunting tools... so if the dog died, your food choices would be severely limited. Heck the Muslims could be right. How ironic would that be? |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Once upon a time, Europe was the most technologically advanced group of nations on Earth, and ran all over the planet as though they owned the whole thing. Small European nations were able to dominate regions and lands far bigger and more populous than themselves. They were the center of all new ideas and the source of almost all progress. The world was in awe of Europe then. Those times have certainly changed.
They are still more technologically advanced, on average, than most of the rest of the world, but the degree of superiority is nothing like it once was. I don't know that Europe has declined. It's more that the rest of the world did a lot of catching up. The United States, Japan and South Korea are some examples of non-European nations that have surpassed all or most of Europe in almost every category. The days of Europe dominating the whole world has drawn to a close for the most part. I see no realistic means of getting back to where they were. They will still be well above average for a very long time. |
![]() |