How is Chinese army evaluating the Iraq war?




 
--
 
March 13th, 2006  
sandy
 

Topic: How is Chinese army evaluating the Iraq war?


In the first stage of the Iraq war,
China applauded to unexpected good fight of Iraq.
It is because Saddam Hussein's strategy was alike Mao Zedong's strategy.
It is said, 'Hussein is Mao Zedong's faithful apprentice' in China.
First of all, Hussein made all people soldiers and challenged the U.S.ーBritain army.
This is to correspond to 'People war' 'The civilian is changed into excellent soldiers' that Mao Zedong recites before.
In addition, Hussein tried to lead in the U.S.-Britain army in the home country territory, and to disturb it by the guerilla fighting.
Saddam Hussein was able also to have brought in to the protracted struggle by the guerilla fighting for the U.S.-Britain army that stood dominant in the forces, military technology, and the armament, and Mao Zedong before was to have become just like.
Military commentator's Son' was praised.
Quote:
'President Hussein is skillfully making good use of the Mao Zedong strategy that changes shape for the intruder named the U.S. military though there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein learnt Mao Zedong's military thought. '
After all,
This is one material that praises Mao Zedong military thought though Iraq was overwhelmed to high-tech weapons of the U.S. military.
Mao Zedong : in the latter half of 1950's.
'It is necessary to promote the modernization of arms and equipment to
oppose the U.S. imperialist. '
He ordered the emergency deployment of 2 bombs and one stars.
This idea was opposed strongly at that time.
It is because it was not possible to arm at all as a lot of those who die of hunger are produced
by the economic mismanagement.
However, Mao Zedong disposed the atomic and hydrogen bombs development that was "Two bounces" and
military satellites that were "One star".
It was after high-tech weapons of the U.S. military had been shown off in the Gulf War that such armament modernization was revalued.
In this Iraq war
The voices such as
'The U.S. government wants only to become a master of the world' and
'The United States democracy is a counterfeit'
become strong, and the voice to request the national defense
expenditure increase becomes strong in China.
In addition, a famous word of Mao Zedong 'The United States is a tiger of paper' is extolled recently.
The anti-American feeling has risen in China.
Moreover, a Chinese army thinks that the U.S. aircraft carrier doesn't become threat any longer.
Judging from the Iraq war, the aircraft carrier only consequentially transported the fighters like tanker.
After all, cruise missile and guided bomb decided the defeat.
They think that the missile is a leading part in future war and are
advancing the armament around the missile.
by ZHAO Hong-wei
March 14th, 2006  
chinese-canadian
 
1. Chinese leaders take both Gulf wars very seriously and as opportunities to study advanced fighting tactics and technology from U.S
2. strategically speaking, Iraqi war is a mixed thing for China,
for its good side, U.S got bogged down in Iraq and had to pay less attention in Far East, where China could really work on "things" without getting much interference from U.S right now
for the down side, U.S is unable to really do something to keep the status quo of Taiwan-China right now (China and U.S both wnat status quo) as you have seen Taiwan's leader Chen just scrapped the unification council agasint the will of its people and will of both U.S and CHina.
March 14th, 2006  
Fox
 
 
I didn't know that China are in Iraq. I'm confusing. Are or was they in Iraq?
--
March 14th, 2006  
chinese-canadian
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
I didn't know that China are in Iraq. I'm confusing. Are or was they in Iraq?
the closest tie both sides had was probably selling China's retired t-59s to Iraqs during the Iraq-Iran war or something...

China wasn't big enough to influence middle-east back then
March 16th, 2006  
zhjsg
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandy
In the first stage of the Iraq war,
China applauded to unexpected good fight of Iraq.
It is because Saddam Hussein's strategy was alike Mao Zedong's strategy.
It is said, 'Hussein is Mao Zedong's faithful apprentice' in China.
First of all, Hussein made all people soldiers and challenged the U.S.ーBritain army.
This is to correspond to 'People war' 'The civilian is changed into excellent soldiers' that Mao Zedong recites before.
In addition, Hussein tried to lead in the U.S.-Britain army in the home country territory, and to disturb it by the guerilla fighting.
Saddam Hussein was able also to have brought in to the protracted struggle by the guerilla fighting for the U.S.-Britain army that stood dominant in the forces, military technology, and the armament, and Mao Zedong before was to have become just like.
Military commentator's Son' was praised.

After all,
This is one material that praises Mao Zedong military thought though Iraq was overwhelmed to high-tech weapons of the U.S. military.
Mao Zedong : in the latter half of 1950's.
'It is necessary to promote the modernization of arms and equipment to
oppose the U.S. imperialist. '
He ordered the emergency deployment of 2 bombs and one stars.
This idea was opposed strongly at that time.
It is because it was not possible to arm at all as a lot of those who die of hunger are produced
by the economic mismanagement.
However, Mao Zedong disposed the atomic and hydrogen bombs development that was "Two bounces" and
military satellites that were "One star".
It was after high-tech weapons of the U.S. military had been shown off in the Gulf War that such armament modernization was revalued.
In this Iraq war
The voices such as
'The U.S. government wants only to become a master of the world' and
'The United States democracy is a counterfeit'
become strong, and the voice to request the national defense
expenditure increase becomes strong in China.
In addition, a famous word of Mao Zedong 'The United States is a tiger of paper' is extolled recently.
The anti-American feeling has risen in China.
Moreover, a Chinese army thinks that the U.S. aircraft carrier doesn't become threat any longer.
Judging from the Iraq war, the aircraft carrier only consequentially transported the fighters like tanker.
After all, cruise missile and guided bomb decided the defeat.
They think that the missile is a leading part in future war and are
advancing the armament around the missile.
by ZHAO Hong-wei

well every man or nation may make mistakes. some even said that china will attack taiwan in 2005. what they said may be what they thought. but the others might think in other way. dont take it too serious