Hitlers bunker 1987...

MontyB

All-Blacks Supporter
Forbidden Photos: Secret Shots of Hitler's Bunker

By Christoph Gunkel
Robert Conrad knew things could get uncomfortable. There were the guards, the explosions, the dark tunnels. He could easily stumble across a detonation in progress, run into a policeman or even land himself in jail.

ANZEIGE
And yet, in the summer of 1987, Conrad donned a construction worker's coverall and a hardhat and hid his camera, a Praktica model with a 35-millimeter wide-angle lens, in a leather shoulder bag of the type carried by many workers in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) at the time. To lend his disguise verisimilitude, Conrad made sure a Thermos jug could be seen poking out of his bag. He wanted to be absolutely sure to look just like any normal construction worker. Thus disguised, the photographer snuck up to the fence around the construction site on Berlin's Otto Grotewohl Strasse and climbed over the barrier. Once inside, he had to suppress the impulse to start running. "I walked very slowly across the site, as if on eggshells, so no one would notice me," he recalls. Conrad was uneasy. Where was the entrance into this underworld of dark concrete ruins that had been buried for decades under Berlin's streets? Would he be able to climb down into the infamous "Führer's bunker," where Adolf Hitler shot himself in April 1945?
Now, some 26 years later, Conrad holds one of the photographic slides for which he risked his neck back then thoughtfully up to the light and makes sure to dispel any possible misunderstandings. "I didn't go to the bunkers hunting for relics or out of some secret admiration for the Nazi regime," he says.
The office Conrad has just moved to in Berlin's Prenzlauer Berg district is still filled with the scent of freshly laid floorboards. The historic building's stucco ceiling was renovated just a few days before, revealing Art Nouveau decorations from 1905. It's a fitting space for Conrad, an architectural photographer with a passion for preventing old things from disappearing.
Essentially, Conrad and his camera have been doing precisely that for decades. Even as a teenager in the 1980s, Conrad traveled all over East Germany photographing the historic half-timbered buildings that the country's Socialist Unity Party (SED) was systematically tearing down and replacing with monotonous prefabricated concrete apartment blocks.
As a form of protest against forgetting history, Conrad lived illegally in buildings slated for demolition and saw himself as a chronicler of the government's mania for destruction. He got in plenty of trouble for it, too. Police interrogated him for hours, threatened him and rifled through his apartment. Studying at university was then out of the question for Conrad, so he got by doing a variety of simple jobs -- and defiantly continued to take photographs.
It was during this time that the nearly forgotten remains of the Nazis' bunker complex were rediscovered in Berlin. In 1986, the East German government made plans to erect a large apartment complex on the corner of Vossstrasse and Otto Grotewohl Strasse, now known as Wilhelmstrasse. In order for those Socialist blocks to go up, concrete from a darker past had to be demolished first. The ground under the construction site turned out to contain not only Adolf Hitler's former bunker, but also the remains of an air raid shelter used by the Neue Reichskanzlei, or New Reich Chancellery, and the foreign ministry.
This required the excavation of massive reinforced concrete walls located up to eight meters (26 feet) deep in the ground, which had to be removed and demolished piece by piece, a laborious undertaking. The victorious Red Army had given up on the "Führer's bunker" back in 1947, after Soviet soldiers attempted to blow it up. They were able to destroy the complex's ventilation shafts, collapse interior walls and even cause the four-meter-thick (13-foot-thick) bunker roof to drop by 40 centimeters (15 inches) from the force of the explosion, but the rest held. This was followed by further blasts 12 years later, but then the East German government filled in the entrances to the ruin of Hitler's bunker, dumped dirt on top of the site and let grass grow over the whole thing in the truest sense of the phrase. That's how things remained until the construction project that began in 1986.

A 'Completely Insane Landscape'

"Of course there was nothing in the newspapers about the Nazi bunkers. That was very much a taboo subject, as was everything about the Nazi period," Conrad explains. "Officially, they were just constructing a new residential neighborhood." The photographer himself discovered the bunker ruin only by chance, when his route as an apprentice bus driver took him past it on Otto Grotewohl Strasse. "My seat in the bus was raised, so I could see over the fence into the construction site," he recalls. "Suddenly I saw this completely insane landscape with enormous concrete ruins that had buried for decades protruding out of the ground." Exposed by the construction, the underground complex now looked as if it were an aboveground bunker.
His photographer's hunting instinct was instantly awakened. He asked around about the history of the site, read what little available information he could find about the underground Nazi bunker and had friends in West Germany send him more material. He started hanging around the site, photographing from the outside the concrete expanse, huge excavating equipment and some of the demolition blasts. He also engaged construction workers leaving the site in innocuous conversation. "I was dying to find out if they needed a special permit in order to be there," Conrad explains. He was relieved to learn that access to the site didn't appear to be under particularly restrictive control. It seemed his plan might work.

Photographing with Fear

Things went smoothly to start with. On his first visit, Conrad found himself in the New Reich Chancellery bunker. He worked hectically, worried he might be caught at any time, taking pictures of rusted ventilation pipes, tiled walls, safes and projectiles. Despite the haste with which he had to work, Conrad is critical of his work as a younger photographer. "Those weren't my best shots. Today I would go about it much more systematically," he says. But at the time, he simply pointed his camera anywhere he could. The most important thing was not getting caught. "My greatest fear was that they would assume I was trying to escape," Conrad says. The concern wasn't an unreasonable one, since the site was located in direct proximity to the border with West Berlin. "As far as I knew, parts of the labyrinth of bunkers ran along under the Wall and even extended into the death strip."
Yet the construction site continued to exert its pull on Conrad like an addictive drug. Since no one noticed him the first time, he went again. And again and again, perhaps 30 times in total, though he no longer remembers exactly. Sometimes months passed between his visits, and sometimes just a few days.


http://www.spiegel.de/international...nker-in-berlin-by-robert-conrad-a-903750.html
 
I am intrigued by all manner of old military fortifications and bunkers, and although I can see why the authorities wanted them destroyed. I still feel that it is a great shame, as it was still a part of our history and I can't see that the destruction of all things connected with Adolf Hitler was going to make him just drop out of sight any faster.

What seems most peculiar to me I suppose is the fact that they went to so much effort to actually destroy the bunker, whereas if all I wanted to do was build over it, I'm sure that with its inherent strength it would have presented no problems to the foundations of any new building.
 
Apparently the site of Hitlers bunker is now a car park and shows one of if not the only photograph of Hitler allowed on public view.
 
Apparently the site of Hitlers bunker is now a car park and shows one of if not the only photograph of Hitler allowed on public view.

It appears that the present day authorities have partially relaxed their approach to things concerning Adolf Hitler, this was mainly bought about because of the fact that their previous secretiveness was counter productive, giving rise to all manner of myths and stories, whereas the truth was actually far more mundane.

The site of the old bunker has been many things over the years, apparently the Russians buried it under a bill of rubble and left it for many years, the next reference I can find to it was that it was part of a children's playground, and now the site of a park and car park behind several state offices and a housing development.
 
It appears that the present day authorities have partially relaxed their approach to things concerning Adolf Hitler, this was mainly bought about because of the fact that their previous secretiveness was counter productive, giving rise to all manner of myths and stories, whereas the truth was actually far more mundane.

The site of the old bunker has been many things over the years, apparently the Russians buried it under a bill of rubble and left it for many years, the next reference I can find to it was that it was part of a children's playground, and now the site of a park and car park behind several state offices and a housing development.

Wiki has a good picture of what it is now...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Führerbunker
 
This is about as near as I could get to it's old location using Google Earth.

In Google earth, the "Photo Icon" within the shaded rectangle links to a photo of the poster showing that is the site of the old bunker. Just looking closely at the area in the car park to the lower left of the site I see that it is still quite "undeveloped" and almost scruffy, considering that this is in the centre of one of Europe's most expensive cities for real estate.

zx_zps056491a9.jpg
 
Last edited:
Oddly enough despite Berlin being a very modern and vibrant city there are areas almost undeveloped especially in the former East Berlin.

In my travels I saw several areas that appear to just be abandoned and a couple of them were clearly WW2 left overs.

But the reason I started this thread was primarily because I did not realise that the bunker had lasted in the condition until the late 1980s I thought it had been destroyed soon after the war.
 
I didn't realise that the subterranean section had been destroyed at all, I thought it had merely been buried and only the surface structures destroyed.

It still seems like a pointless expense taking into account the huge amount of work that would have been needed, the roof alone was 4 metres thick. I would have thought it would have been far easier to destroy the entrances and just forget about it.
 
I didn't realise that the subterranean section had been destroyed at all, I thought it had merely been buried and only the surface structures destroyed.

It still seems like a pointless expense taking into account the huge amount of work that would have been needed, the roof alone was 4 metres thick. I would have thought it would have been far easier to destroy the entrances and just forget about it.

I was always told that the Russians blew it up shortly after the war and to be honest I can understand why so I never really questioned it so this was a bit of a surprise.
 
One of the reasons discussed on TV why Hitlers bunker was buried/blown up was incase it became a shrine to Hitler and the NAZI party. However, the site where Hitler held his rallies in Nuremberg is pretty well intact.
 
One of the reasons discussed on TV why Hitlers bunker was buried/blown up was incase it became a shrine to Hitler and the NAZI party. However, the site where Hitler held his rallies in Nuremberg is pretty well intact.
I think the difference being, that the bunker was in Soviet Berlin and we all know the lengths they will go to to destroy or hide something they don't agree with. A good example being Hitler's remains which they would not even admit to having for 40 years or more.
 
Last edited:
I think the difference being, that the bunker was in Soviet Berlin and we all know the lengths they will go to to destroy or hide something they don't agree with. A good example being Hitler's remains which they would not even admit to having for 40 years or more.

Its interesting you mentioned Hitler's remains. An American went to Russia to view the skull that the Soviets claimed Adolfs skull, when no one was looking the American chap broke off a piece for DNA testing, when tested it was found to be a woman's skull. There is so much information regarding WW2 that will never ever be released as being too sensitive.

Apparently a number of people living in the USA are related to Hitler in one way or another, one chap refused to be interviewed.
 
Hitler and Eva Braun were allegedly cremated together, so I'd say the fact that it was a woman's skull really doesn't mean a lot, just that they mixed up the skulls, and knowing what we do of the Russkies liking for subterfuge and disinformation, it could well have been done deliberately.

They never did like to share their toys, and took great pleasure at sending people on wild goose chases.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top